🚀 go-pugleaf

JCT: More discussion about discredited Socred pseudo-
philosopher Bill Ryan's piss-possessed posts on sci.engr: 
 
>From: Brian Whatcott <betw...@sbcglobal.net> 
>Date: Tues, Sep 26 2006 11:30 pm  
>Groups: sci.engr 

BW: I realise it won't do any good, until someone takes up 
my offer of a reward for stopping Ryan from echoing Turmel 
but it made me feel a whole lot better to send a copy of 
Ryans P-Boy note back to his email address - for eac of his 
dumb copies. Dozens! Won't you join me? Brian Whatcott Altus 
OK 
---

>From:  Brian Whatcott <betw...@sbcglobal.net> 
>Date:  Fri, Oct 13 2006 12:19 am  

BW: As a follow on step, I copied his note to the yahoo 
abuse line with a request to handle the problem.. 
---

>From:  Greg Locock <gregloc...@yahoo.com.au> 
>Date:  Fri, Oct 13 2006 6:58 am  
>Groups:   sci.engr 

GL: Hi Brian, You are a valued contributor to sci.engr.* and 
I always appreciate your posts. But in this case I have to 
disagree. Turmel is an egotistial loon, who has destroyed 
sci.engr, and adds zero to the newsgroup. While I agree, 
Ryan adds nothing positive  to the group, he may, 
eventually, drive the completely useless Turmel away from 
posting here. He may not, but that seems to me to be a risk 
worth taking. Why do you think that the idiot Turmel has a 
right to free speech, whereas the monomaniac Ryan does not? 
Cheers Greg 

JCT: My posts prevent him from reading others'? My posts 
crowd out others'? 
---

>From:  Brian Whatcott <betw...@sbcglobal.net> 
>Date:  Fri, Oct 13 2006 7:57 am  
>Groups:   sci.engr 

BW: Fair question: Ryan's vaporings are repetitious, 
Turmel's vaporings are different, every one. A pox on both 
of them. 
However, a spirit of free speech restrains one from 
censoring the endless variety of schlock from T. Ryans 
effusions are devoid of new meaning - a definition of 
noise.  Brian Whatcott    Altus OK 
---

>From:  Greg Locock <gregloc...@yahoo.com.au> 
>Date:  Fri, Oct 13 2006 6:24 pm  
>Groups:   sci.engr 

GL: Fair enough, go for it. Sadly neither are really 
breaking any hard and fast rules. 

JCT: Actually, Brian's point is that "the endless variety of 
schlock from T. Ryans effusions are devoid of new meaning - 
a definition of noise." It's an abuse. 

GL: Still, it's an interesting experiment. Hmm, I wonder if 
anyone has tried reporting the contemptible fool Turmel to 
his ISP? So far as I am aware the T&Cs do theoretically 
forbid abuse of Usenet. Cheers 

JCT: Go ahead and form your complaint. Go ahead and make
your case for abuse. Let's see you back up your beefs. I say
you're a big mouth who can't frame an argument. Go ahead.
Make your case! You choose to spout your vacuous mumblings 
to an engineering group. Act like an engineer and back up 
what you say. If you can. I bet you can't.