Article View: sci.envionment
Article #3Re: The Final {Environmentalist} Genocide Solution
From: P van Heusden
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 1995 00:00
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 1995 00:00
45 lines
3207 bytes
3207 bytes
Carlo Izzo <izzo> writes: > >>Here-and-now >>solutions such as harsh penalties for environmental abuses and forcing >>polluting companies to fully internalize the costs of their actions >>(to name just two), on the other hand, offer some hope that one can >>believe in when one is _awake_. > Those companies are not just polluting, they are also producing > wealth. You are enjoying that wealth too (and maybe you don't > deserve it). Hah hah. Let me give you an example: Thor Chemicals at Cato Ridge were importing mercury waste for 'recycling'. They made a lot of money doing this. They created wealth. So far, 2 Thor workers have died of mercury poisoning. The brother of one of the workers who died is still working at Thor, because there's no other employment to go around. Is it right for Thor to create wealth like this at the expense of their workers (who, btw, were not told what the risks were)? The cost of creating wealth must be seen in more than classical economic terms. The electricity I buy would be more expensive if cleaner technology were used to make it. At the moment, it however remains cheap, and the people living close to the (coal) power stations are subjected to acid rain and health risks. The cost this electricity generation is exacting upon them is not calculated into my bill, because classical economics can't calculate factors like that. Wealth is created by means of profit - by means of supplying something worth more to your consumer than it cost to produce. If the *true* (ie. total social, environmental and economic cost) cost of production were calculated in, would we still see ourselves as creating wealth? Please tell me how a economic system which cannot calculate in the true environmental and social costs of actions can have any relevance as a form of social or environmental protection. If people and the environment are not going to be protected by the economic system, then surely we need something else - like regulation. Peter -- ****************************************************************************** Peter van Heusden | UCT ITS/TSS | "Ek vind geen klinkende pvh@ucthpx.uct.ac.za | standard disclaimer | rym vir rewolusie ..." +27 21 650 3018 | applies | Joan Hambidge
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<41sdhn$9p5@ucthpx.uct.ac.za>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<Pine.BSD/.3.91.950821043222.14327D-100000@conch.aa.msen.com> <41aida$gnv@sat.ipp-garching.mpg.de> <41ashu$9fm@helena.MT.net> <41d0f3$3d0@ionews.io.org> <41dr7j$q3m@degas.ICSI.Net> <41fn03$1mlv@sat.ipp-garching.mpg.de> <qpqrb2awfkv.fsf@netcom20.netcom.com> <41kodq$19l3@sat.ipp-garching.mpg.de>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: fecdc,51cfde121ac9419
X-Google-Attributes: gidfecdc,public
X-Google-Thread: fb58e,8b651b40d40d6853
X-Google-Attributes: gidfb58e,public
X-Google-Thread: 10df74,8b651b40d40d6853
X-Google-Attributes: gid10df74,public
From: pvh@ucthpx.uct.ac.za (P van Heusden)
Subject: Re: The Final {Environmentalist} Genocide Solution
Date: 1995/08/28
Message-ID: <41sdhn$9p5@ucthpx.uct.ac.za>
X-Deja-AN: 109031251
references: <Pine.BSD/.3.91.950821043222.14327D-100000@conch.aa.msen.com> <41aida$gnv@sat.ipp-garching.mpg.de> <41ashu$9fm@helena.MT.net> <41d0f3$3d0@ionews.io.org> <41dr7j$q3m@degas.ICSI.Net> <41fn03$1mlv@sat.ipp-garching.mpg.de> <qpqrb2awfkv.fsf@netcom20.netcom.com> <41kodq$19l3@sat.ipp-garching.mpg.de>
organization: University of Cape Town
newsgroups: sci.envionment,talk.environment,ca.environment