Article View: sci.fractals
Article #255Fractal Witchcraft speed?
From: Michael R. Ganss
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1992 13:57
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1992 13:57
20 lines
1294 bytes
1294 bytes
Does anyone out there know how FractalWitchcraft achieves its speed? I was completely stunned at the time it took FW to generate the example image (Lightning...) in comparison to Fractint 17.2 with no floating point and guessing: Fractint 17.2: ca. 2h15min FW: ca. 20sec (486-33) I've figured that FW's speed cannot result from the way it builds up the screen. First of all, there is nearly no difference between edge tracing on and off. Also, I believe the little pseudo-tesseral thing it does can't be credited for the speed (it doesn't even recognize larger areas of single color). I think FW must have some speedup in the core iteration loop, mainly because it seems nearly unaffected by iteration limit variations. Anybody got more info? Thanks -- Michael R. Ganss B: Cup or cone? rms@cs.tu-berlin.de A: Cone. I like to lick.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Dec16.135708.13453@cs.tu-berlin.de>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!mcsun!Germany.EU.net!news.netmbx.de!mailgzrz.TU-Berlin.DE!cs.tu-berlin.de!opal.cs.tu-berlin.de!rmsShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: sci.fractals Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!mcsun!Germany.EU.net!news.netmbx.de!mailgzrz.TU-Berlin.DE!cs.tu-berlin.de!opal.cs.tu-berlin.de!rms From: rms@cs.tu-berlin.de (Michael R. Ganss) Subject: Fractal Witchcraft speed? Message-ID: <1992Dec16.135708.13453@cs.tu-berlin.de> Sender: news@cs.tu-berlin.de Organization: Technical University of Berlin, Germany Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1992 13:57:08 GMT Lines: 20