Article View: sci.geo.fluids
Article #19Re: eddy resolving ocean modeling
From: dan graves
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 1992 04:26
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 1992 04:26
14 lines
1107 bytes
1107 bytes
In article <1992Mar30.191520.14628@lamont.ldgo.columbia.edu>, sasha@ldgo.columbia.edu (alexander krupitsky) writes: |> It is known that eddy-resolving quasi-geostrophic models do |> better job in reproducing Gulf Stream transport than primitive |> equations models. Could anyone explain why? |> |> Alexander I am not sure exactly what you mean. Quasi-geostrophic refers to how the coriolus term in the navier stokes eqn is treated. Primitive equation refers to the fact that you are dealing with velocities and pressures and not stream functions and vorticities. These are two different issues. dan
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<sdmtfINNafu@agate.berkeley.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!agate!jonas.berkeley.edu!danReferences:
<1992Mar30.191520.14628@lamont.ldgo.columbia.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!agate!jonas.berkeley.edu!dan From: dan@jonas.berkeley.edu (dan graves) Newsgroups: sci.geo.fluids Subject: Re: eddy resolving ocean modeling Keywords: Gulf Stream transport Message-ID: <sdmtfINNafu@agate.berkeley.edu> Date: 14 Apr 92 04:26:23 GMT Article-I.D.: agate.sdmtfINNafu References: <1992Mar30.191520.14628@lamont.ldgo.columbia.edu> Organization: University of California Berkeley Lines: 14 NNTP-Posting-Host: jonas.berkeley.edu