Re: Segmentation and Remotely Sensed Data.

Article View: sci.image.processing

Article #104

Back to sci.image.processing Previous Next

#104

From: Eric Majani
Date: Tue, 04 Aug 1992 22:32

20 lines
1233 bytes

In article <1992Aug4.183535.5475@organpipe.uug.arizona.edu> julien@scs.leeds.ac.uk (J C Flack) writes:
>
>I am trying to locate any research that evaluates the effectiveness/validity
>of standard segmentation processes (i.e.  region growing, split and merge,
>thresholding, clustering) --- in the context of *Remotely Sensed* imagery
>(i.e. Landsat, Spot, various airborne things). I am similarly interested in
>an evaluation of edge detection in remote sensing.
>

Try:

Hierarchical Segmentation using a composite criterion for remotely sensed imagery
by Goldberg-M and Zhang-JY
Photogrammetria
Vol 42 issue 3, pp. 87-96
1987

-Eric Majani

PS: Let me know what else you find out.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1992Aug4.223211.27973@elroy.jpl.nasa.gov>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!stanford.edu!ames!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!eric

References: <1992Aug4.183535.5475@organpipe.uug.arizona.edu>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Newsgroups: sci.image.processing
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!stanford.edu!ames!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!eric
From: eric@elroy.Jpl.Nasa.Gov (Eric Majani)
Subject: Re: Segmentation and Remotely Sensed Data.
Message-ID: <1992Aug4.223211.27973@elroy.jpl.nasa.gov>
Keywords: remote sensing, segmentation
Sender: news@elroy.jpl.nasa.gov (Usenet)
Nntp-Posting-Host: luri.jpl.nasa.gov
Organization: Image Analysis Systems Group, JPL
References: <1992Aug4.183535.5475@organpipe.uug.arizona.edu>
Date: Tue, 4 Aug 1992 22:32:11 GMT
Lines: 21

Reply to Parent Message