I think 320*200 pixels are enough !

Article View: sci.image.processing

Article #1312

Back to sci.image.processing Previous Next

#1312

From: Karl-Hugo Weesberg
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 02:27

1 lines
871 bytes

We don't need higher resolutions for images ...

Technical Details

Message-ID: <7666ed5f.0410241827.77c1f9d5@posting.google.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Thread: 10aee9,1720efc3638e1a6c,start
X-Google-Thread: f4f6f,1720efc3638e1a6c,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid10aee9,gidf4f6f,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail
From: netspider4@lycos.com (Karl-Hugo Weesberg)
Newsgroups: sci.image.processing,can.uucp
Subject: I think 320*200 pixels are enough !
Date: 24 Oct 2004 19:27:14 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 1
Message-ID: <7666ed5f.0410241827.77c1f9d5@posting.google.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 65.90.49.2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1098671234 7075 127.0.0.1 (25 Oct 2004 02:27:14 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 02:27:14 +0000 (UTC)