Article View: sci.image.processing
Article #350Re: Segmentation and Remotely Sensed Data -- SUMMARY
From: J C Flack
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 1992 16:29
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 1992 16:29
56 lines
2870 bytes
2870 bytes
As promised here is a summary of the replies I got to from my query concerning the segmentation of remotely sensed images. The original posting was sent to: sci.image.processing, comp.infosystems.gis and IMARS-L. ==================================================================== The evaluation and comparison of segmentation techniques has long since been a problem: In article <1992Aug5.185035.21313@Arco.COM> opus@arco.com (Dr. Steven 'Wild Man'Wong) > The problem with evaluating standard segmentation processes is that we > have too much of the 'See ma, no hands' syndrome that also affects the KBS > (knowledge based systems) community. Unfortunately, I also was part of > that crowd. What we need is a public accessible place with standard > benchmarks and algorihms that everyone can experiment with, test, and > compare against. This idea has been proposed again and again but still > hasn't gathered any steam. The standard picture of 'the girl' just > doesn't cut it. Peter Sincak mailing to IMARS-L argued that it is difficult to establish definitions of edges, homogenous areas, clusters ... and it is therefore difficult to evaluate segmentations. I think part of the problem in complex scenes, is that you can have more than one correct segmentation --- it really depends on what your user wants from a decomposition of the image. ===================================================================== Eric Majani recommends the following reference: Hierarchical Segmentation using a composite criterion for remotely sensed imagery Goldberg-M and Zhang-JY Photogrammetria Vol 42 issue 3, pp. 87-96, 1987 ===================================================================== Janet Franklin, in reply to my comp.infosystems.gis posting suggested that the work done by Tailor, Cross, Mason, Hogg et al on the knowledge base interpretation of remotely sensed images could be useful. Their work is based on a map guided segmentation using high level domain specific knowledge to improve the acuracy of the image decompostion. I have a complete set of reference for that work ... email me if you are interested. ===================================================================== Thanks to all those who replied to my postings .... Julien Flack, University of Leeds. email: julien@scs.leeds.ac.uk
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Aug13.162933.6667@organpipe.uug.arizona.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!gatech!destroyer!ncar!noao!amethyst!organpipe.uug.arizona.edu!julienShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!gatech!destroyer!ncar!noao!amethyst!organpipe.uug.arizona.edu!julien From: julien@scs.leeds.ac.uk (J C Flack) Newsgroups: sci.image.processing Subject: Re: Segmentation and Remotely Sensed Data -- SUMMARY Keywords: segmentation, remote sensing Message-ID: <1992Aug13.162933.6667@organpipe.uug.arizona.edu> Date: 13 Aug 92 16:29:33 GMT Sender: news@organpipe.uug.arizona.edu Organization: The University of Leeds, School of Computer Studies Lines: 56