Thread View: sci.image.processing
3 messages
3 total messages
Started by craa85
Wed, 05 Aug 1992 10:37
Pattern identification
Author: craa85
Date: Wed, 05 Aug 1992 10:37
Date: Wed, 05 Aug 1992 10:37
8 lines
649 bytes
649 bytes
Is there any known way of instantaneously identifying a bit stream (i.e. a very simple bit map of an image) using hardware techniques. The idea is to avoid using processing power to identify the image. Many thanks in advance. -- craa85@uk.ac.strath
Re: Pattern identification
Author: Larry D. Pyeatt
Date: Thu, 06 Aug 1992 21:01
Date: Thu, 06 Aug 1992 21:01
23 lines
1636 bytes
1636 bytes
In article <1992Aug5.103712.24039@ccsun.strath.ac.uk>, craa85@ccsun.strath.ac.uk writes:
|> Is there any known way of instantaneously identifying a bit stream (i.e. a
|> very simple bit map of an image) using hardware techniques. The idea is
|> to avoid using processing power to identify the image.
|>
If the pattern is fairly small and you are only concerned with an exact match,
you could build a state machine and feed it one bit at a time.
If the pattern is more complex, you could store it in an eprom, and compare
it byte by byte to your new pattern. This also would require a state machine
(counter) to control access to the eprom.
You could also do it using combinatorial logic. A stack of eproms could be
programmed to retreive a code for any pattern which is fed into its address space.
This solution should allow the identification of several bit patterns with
one circuit.
--
Larry D. Pyeatt The views expressed here are not
Internet : pyeatt@texaco.com those of my employer or of anyone
Voice : (713) 975-4056 that I know of with the possible
exception of myself.
Re: Pattern identification
Author: Steve Lamont
Date: Thu, 06 Aug 1992 23:53
Date: Thu, 06 Aug 1992 23:53
15 lines
1128 bytes
1128 bytes
In article <1992Aug5.103712.24039@ccsun.strath.ac.uk> craa85@ccsun.strath.ac.uk writes: >Is there any known way of instantaneously identifying a bit stream (i.e. a >very simple bit map of an image) using hardware techniques. The idea is >to avoid using processing power to identify the image. Spang it into a frame buffer and look at it? Why do you need to "avoid using processing power?" spl -- Steve Lamont, SciViGuy -- (619) 534-7968 -- spl@dim.ucsd.edu UCSD Microscopy and Imaging Resource/UCSD Med School/La Jolla, CA 92093-0608 "But is there hope to save/Even this ethereal essense from the grave?" - James Russel Lowell, "Ode Recited at the Harvard Commemoration"
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads