Thread View: sci.image.processing
4 messages
4 total messages
Started by singlis
Thu, 27 Aug 1992 09:58
2D Fourier Transforms, in English.
Author: singlis
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 1992 09:58
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 1992 09:58
11 lines
740 bytes
740 bytes
Thanks to all who replied about FFT segmentation. A Fourier Transform in 1D is a breakdown into the waveform component sin/cos terms. This sin/cos waves when added approximate (v. closely) the original waveform. How is the 2D case explained? Is the 2D transform a sum of "planar" sin/cos "waves", or is it more of a breakdown of the horizontal groups of vertical transforms? -Stuart Inglis
Re: 2D Fourier Transforms, in English.
Author: David Kastrup
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 1992 22:56
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 1992 22:56
23 lines
1538 bytes
1538 bytes
singlis@waikato.ac.nz writes: >Thanks to all who replied about FFT segmentation. >A Fourier Transform in 1D is a breakdown into the waveform component >sin/cos terms. This sin/cos waves when added approximate (v. closely) the >original waveform. >How is the 2D case explained? Is the 2D transform a sum of "planar" sin/cos >"waves", or is it more of a breakdown of the horizontal groups of vertical >transforms? Due to the separability, you can do row and column transforms after each other, but you can do it the other way round as well, so this would seem to be missing the point some way. Another possibility is to view the term (xu+yv) in the exponential as a dot product (x,y).(u,v). If you view (u,v) as a vector, you can interpret the value at index (u,v) as a complex exponential wave crossing the picture in direction (1/u,1/v) (or was that (v,u)?) with frequency |u,v|. A real- valued interpretation (phase and amplitude) would have to take index (-u,-v) into consideration as well.
Re: 2D Fourier Transforms, in English.
Author: Paul Kube
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 1992 23:26
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 1992 23:26
28 lines
1656 bytes
1656 bytes
In article <1992Aug27.215818.10407@waikato.ac.nz>, singlis@waikato.ac.nz writes: |> Thanks to all who replied about FFT segmentation. |> |> How is the 2D case explained? Is the 2D transform a sum of "planar" sin/cos |> "waves", or is it more of a breakdown of the horizontal groups of vertical |> transforms? The two are equivalent, as you can see by looking at the equations. E.g. define the relationship between the Fourier pair f(x,y), F(u,v) as F(u,v) = \int \int f(x,y) \exp (-2 \pi i (ux + vy) ) dx dy (1) f(x,y) = \int \int F(u,v) \exp ( 2 \pi i (ux + vy) ) du dv (2) Reorder the integration in (1) to get F(u,v) = \int [ \int f(x,y) \exp (-2\pi i vy) dy ] \exp (-2\pi i ux) dx which shows you can think of the 2D transform F(u,v) as the 1D "horizontal" transform of the function that is the 1D "vertical" transform of f(x,y) for each x. On the other hand, (2) shows that f(x,y) is the sum of functions of the form \exp(2\pi i (ux + vy)), each weighted by F(u,v) du dv. Each component is a plane complex exponential of frequency \sqrt(u^2 + v^2) and orientation \arctan (v/y). --Paul
Information on OCR products needed
Author: Chan Kay Kit
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 1992 05:33
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 1992 05:33
54 lines
2535 bytes
2535 bytes
Hello everyone,
There are many commercial OCR engines on the market right now for
reading printed text. I am aware of products like the Kurzweil K-5000 and
Discover 7320 Model 5 (from Xerox), OmniPage (from Caere Corp.), SAIC (from
Differential Processing System) and NestorReader.
I wonder if anybody has done independent evaluation of any OCR
products, since such information would be useful to potential users.
Specifically, I need answers to the following questions:
(i) name of product and company which produces it
(ii) fonts and point sizes handled by product
(iii) whether the OCR engine exhibits true multifont and "multisize"
capability i.e. is able to recognize text without the user
having to specify in advance its font type and point size.
If so, what is the accuracy over a variety of fonts and point sizes?
If not, what is the accuracy over common fonts like Courier, Times
Roman and Helvetica and point sizes from 8 to 24 points?
(iv) What are the commercial OCR products, if any, that can
1. recognise a page of text containing a mixture of fonts and point
sizes at greater than 98% accuracy?
2. recognise a page of text containing a single known font and a
range of point sizes at greater than 99% accuracy?
(v) Are there any commercial OCR systems that accept noisy input or
text on shaded background eg. carbon and photostated/fax copies and
still maintain an acceptable accuracy (say greater than 95%)?
Further, if there are any evaluations of commercial handwritten OCR systems,
I will also be interested to hear about them.
Please email all replies/references to kaykit@iti.gov.sg. If there are
enough responses, I will summarise.
Thanks!
---
Kay-Kit CHAN | Internet: kaykit@iti.gov.sg
Knowledge Systems Lab | Bitnet: kaykit@itivax
Information Technology Institute | Tel: (65) 772-0920
National Computer Board of Singapore | Fax: (65) 770-3043
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads