Article View: sci.lang
Article #1920Re: Rhetorical question
From: BLICK
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 1992 22:03
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 1992 22:03
27 lines
1541 bytes
1541 bytes
In article <6819@npri6.npri.com> eric@npri6.npri.com (Eric Williams) writes: >For instance, asign reads: > > "No smoking section inside." > >This can be interpreted as 1) there are multiple seating sections, one >of which is for non-smokers; 2) no smokers allowed at all. >The implied result is that non-smokers will always be accommodated. >I know this is just semantic fuzziness, but I thought it was fun >enough that someone might have labelled it. Email your thoughts to >me, as my net-days are numbered (under a dozen). > Classifying this kind of statement as "just semantic fuzziness" tends to dismiss further evidence of a lack of concern on the part of many people (in this case the writer of the sign) for clarity in use of the language. It is the kind of thing about which all of us should be more careful. In this case, insertion of a hyphen to create "no-smoking section inside" would eliminate confusion and indicate that the place contains sections for both smokers and non-smokers. Eddie Blick Journalism Department Louisiana Tech University
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<168CDE1FC.BLICK@VM.CC.LATECH.EDU>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!haven.umd.edu!darwin.sura.net!newshost.LaTech.edu!VM.CC.LATECH.EDU!BLICKReferences:
<6819@npri6.npri.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: sci.lang,misc.writing,sci.logic Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!haven.umd.edu!darwin.sura.net!newshost.LaTech.edu!VM.CC.LATECH.EDU!BLICK From: BLICK@VM.CC.LATECH.EDU Subject: Re: Rhetorical question Message-ID: <168CDE1FC.BLICK@VM.CC.LATECH.EDU> Sender: usenet@engr.LaTech.edu Nntp-Posting-Host: vm.cc.latech.edu Organization: Louisiana Tech University References: <6819@npri6.npri.com> Date: Wed, 30 Dec 92 16:03:57 CST Lines: 27