Article View: sci.lang
Article #1952Re: labio-velars to labials, but reverse?
From: Rich Alderson
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 1992 23:10
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 1992 23:10
43 lines
2716 bytes
2716 bytes
In article <robrtsnj-311292101210@peirce.byu.edu>, robrtsnj@yvax (John S. Robertson) writes:
>The passing of labio-velar to labials is a well established fact (e.g. I.E.
>*kw to Greek p before back vowels, or I.E. *gw to Greek b/Latin v), but has
>anyone ever heard of a p or b becoming a kw or gw? Just curious. Any
>examples of either direction of change would be appreciated.
The environment for the Attic/Ionic Greek change is more complex than "before
back vowels": In the environment of a *u, the labial element was lost and a
plain velar resulted. (In some Aeolic dialects, *k<w> > p even before front
vowels.)
And there were other things going on in Attic and Ionic, as well: The word for
"horse," *ekwos (*k + *w), develops to /hippos/ in Attic (and some other
dialects), but the form /hikkos/ is usual (constant?) in Herodotos.
The changes from labial to labiovelar with which I am familiar are analogical:
Latin quinque < PIE *penk<w>e "5"
Old Ir. coic
Germanic shows a small number of labiovelar > labial items, for example
Gothic fidwor < PIE *k<w>etwor "4"
Gothic fimf < PIE *penk<w>e
And of course Romanian shows labials for Proto-Romance labiovelars and
velar+*w clusters, cf. Latin lingua, Rom. limba.
Let's see. In Oscan and Umbrian, *k<w> > p, as it does in British Celtic
(Welsh, Cornish, Breton).
I don't have the book handy, so I can't say exactly which correspondence set it
is, but in Haas's _Prehistory of Language_ (Mouton), she reconstructs a
labiovelar fricative for a set which contrasts with velars and labials. The
reconstructed etymon is *ix<w>aNi/u- "squirrel" which for some reason has stuck
with me for 20 years (since I first read the book).
I don't know whether any of this is of interest or use to you.
--
Rich Alderson 'I wish life was not so short,' he thought. 'Languages take
such a time, and so do all the things one wants to know about.'
--J. R. R. Tolkien,
alderson@leland.stanford.edu _The Lost Road_
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Dec31.231056.27596@leland.Stanford.EDU>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!stanford.edu!nntp.Stanford.EDU!aldersonReferences:
<robrtsnj-311292101210@peirce.byu.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: sci.lang Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!stanford.edu!nntp.Stanford.EDU!alderson From: alderson@elaine46.Stanford.EDU (Rich Alderson) Subject: Re: labio-velars to labials, but reverse? In-Reply-To: robrtsnj@yvax.byu.edu (John S. Robertson) Message-ID: <1992Dec31.231056.27596@leland.Stanford.EDU> Originator: alderson@leland.Stanford.EDU Sender: ?@leland.Stanford.EDU Reply-To: alderson@elaine46.Stanford.EDU (Rich Alderson) Organization: Stanford University Academic Information Resources References: <robrtsnj-311292101210@peirce.byu.edu> Date: Thu, 31 Dec 92 23:10:56 GMT Lines: 43