Article View: sci.lang
Article #1985Re: Bulgarians - descendents of a Finn...
From: Jacques Guy
Date: Mon, 04 Jan 1993 03:21
Date: Mon, 04 Jan 1993 03:21
21 lines
1383 bytes
1383 bytes
hubey@pilot.njin.net (Hubey) writes: >The Chuvash language is known as a 'lir' Turkish vs almost >all the rest which are 'shaz' languages. The 'sh', 'a' and >'z' in most Turkic languages become 'l','i','r' in this >group. >I can't understand how the 'sh' became an 'l', though. Is >there any occurances of this in other languages ? Strange. I know of at least one case of change in the other direction (l --> sh), and that is in Picard, the French dialect spoken in the region of Amiens. That change seems natural enough: from lateral to lateral fricative, then devoiced. Z to r is also strange; once again, it's usually the other way around as far as I know, e.g. French chaire --> chaise, and, if memory serves, Latin r --> s. Off-hand, I can't think of cases of a regular change of sh into l, or of z into r. Could it be that it is Chuvash that has been the conservative one, phonologically?
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1993Jan4.032130.12753@trl.oz.au>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!munnari.oz.au!titan!hal!jbmReferences:
<1993Jan3.164904.6398@desire.wright.edu> <Jan.3.19.08.23.1993.201@pilot.njin.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: sci.lang Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!munnari.oz.au!titan!hal!jbm From: jbm@hal.trl.OZ.AU (Jacques Guy) Subject: Re: Bulgarians - descendents of a Finn... Message-ID: <1993Jan4.032130.12753@trl.oz.au> Sender: root@trl.oz.au (System PRIVILEGED Account) Organization: Telecom Research Labs, Melbourne, Australia References: <1993Jan3.164904.6398@desire.wright.edu> <Jan.3.19.08.23.1993.201@pilot.njin.net> Date: Mon, 4 Jan 1993 03:21:30 GMT Lines: 21