Article View: sci.lang
Article #1996Re: "Nominative" absolute?
From: connolly
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 1992 05:30
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 1992 05:30
50 lines
2605 bytes
2605 bytes
In article <1992Dec18.211826.45778@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu>, miner@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu writes: [Much learned stuff omitted] > BTW in Ecclesiatical Latin, e.g., in the Vulgate, we > even have genitive absolutes, in immitation of Greek: > > Qui ostendunt opus legis scriptum in cordibus suis, > testimonium reddente illis conscientia ipsorum, et inter > se invicem cogitationum accusantium, aut etiam defendentium. > > Who show the work of the law written in their hearts, > their own conscience bearing testimony to them, and > their thoughts accusing them, or even defending them > to themselves. > > - Rom. ii, 15. > > Nunn gives this one and cites also Acts i, 8 and II Cor. x, 15. I've checked these, and I think Nunn is simply wrong on the latter two. The genitive NP + participle in Acts 1:8 seems to be a normal genitive attached to the NP _virtutem_, though that is *not* the construction in the Greek, which seems to have an absolute. Perhaps Jerome misunder- stood. Anyway, it reads: sed accipietis virtutem supervenientis Spiritus sancti in vos... 'but you will accept the power of the Holy Spirit coming over you...' 2 Cor 10:15 plainly has an adnominal genitive construction in Latin and, I think, in Greek, but variant Latin readings with ablative absolute do exist. The key part of the verse reads: ...spem autem habentes crescentis fuidei vestrae... 'having hope in your growing faith' Rom 2:15 is less certain. My edition emends to an ablative absolute, against all the manuscripts (at least, the respectable ones). The Greek seems ambiguous: kai metaxy alle:l:on to:n logismo:n kate:go- rounto:n could be a new absolute, or it could depend on the NP in the preceding genitive absolute. Jerome seems to have taken the second interpretation, so that the Vulgate passage could be translated: the awareness of themselves and of the thoughts that accuse or defend them (all) testifying against them ... Still, the case for a genitive absolute can be made here, but it is not ironclad. --Leo Connolly
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Dec20.233022.4723@memstvx1.memst.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!darwin.sura.net!cs.utk.edu!memstvx1!connollyReferences:
<1992Dec16.002418.4636@memstvx1.memst.edu> <1992Dec17.085109.45712@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu> <1992Dec17.233249.4681@memstvx1.memst.edu> <1992Dec18.211826.45778@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!darwin.sura.net!cs.utk.edu!memstvx1!connolly From: connolly@memstvx1.memst.edu Newsgroups: sci.lang Subject: Re: "Nominative" absolute? Message-ID: <1992Dec20.233022.4723@memstvx1.memst.edu> Date: 20 Dec 92 23:30:22 -0600 References: <1992Dec16.002418.4636@memstvx1.memst.edu> <1992Dec17.085109.45712@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu> <1992Dec17.233249.4681@memstvx1.memst.edu> <1992Dec18.211826.45778@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu> Organization: Memphis State University Lines: 50