🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: sci.lang
Article #2003

Re: Bah! to bhaashaa

#2003
From: Peter Christian
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 20:32
23 lines
1419 bytes
In-Reply-To: <1993Jan18.002731.6997@trl.oz.au> jbm@hal.trl.OZ.AU (Jacques Guy)


> I found learning to write Chinese no more difficult than English.
> Perhaps Chinese children are considered to be fluent only when
> in their teens because Chinese teachers insist on decent standards
> of literacy.

I don't think fluency is the issue, it's having learnt to recognize and
reproduce 4000+ different characters. The task of learning to write
correctly (i.e. to form the letters correctly) is fairly soon
accomplished in an alphabetic script, and it's the relation of sound
to spelling that's the problem. In Chinese, learning the inventory of
signs is the whole task essentially. The enormous numbers of
homophones must make it difficult too.

Peter

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Peter Christian                         
  Dept of European Languages              peter@gold.ac.uk
  Goldsmiths' College, London.            petex@cix.compulink.co.uk
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Technical Details
Message-ID: <memo.884324@cix.compulink.co.uk>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!pipex!demon!cix.compulink.co.uk!petex

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!pipex!demon!cix.compulink.co.uk!petex
Newsgroups: sci.lang
From: petex@cix.compulink.co.uk (Peter Christian)
Subject: Re: Bah! to bhaashaa
Reply-To: petex@cix.compulink.co.uk
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 20:32:00 +0000
Message-ID: <memo.884324@cix.compulink.co.uk>
Sender: usenet@demon.co.uk
Lines: 24