Article View: sci.lang
Article #2003Re: Bah! to bhaashaa
From: Peter Christian
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 20:32
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 20:32
23 lines
1419 bytes
1419 bytes
In-Reply-To: <1993Jan18.002731.6997@trl.oz.au> jbm@hal.trl.OZ.AU (Jacques Guy) > I found learning to write Chinese no more difficult than English. > Perhaps Chinese children are considered to be fluent only when > in their teens because Chinese teachers insist on decent standards > of literacy. I don't think fluency is the issue, it's having learnt to recognize and reproduce 4000+ different characters. The task of learning to write correctly (i.e. to form the letters correctly) is fairly soon accomplished in an alphabetic script, and it's the relation of sound to spelling that's the problem. In Chinese, learning the inventory of signs is the whole task essentially. The enormous numbers of homophones must make it difficult too. Peter ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Peter Christian Dept of European Languages peter@gold.ac.uk Goldsmiths' College, London. petex@cix.compulink.co.uk ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<memo.884324@cix.compulink.co.uk>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!pipex!demon!cix.compulink.co.uk!petexShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!pipex!demon!cix.compulink.co.uk!petex Newsgroups: sci.lang From: petex@cix.compulink.co.uk (Peter Christian) Subject: Re: Bah! to bhaashaa Reply-To: petex@cix.compulink.co.uk Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 20:32:00 +0000 Message-ID: <memo.884324@cix.compulink.co.uk> Sender: usenet@demon.co.uk Lines: 24