🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: sci.lang
Article #2127

Re: Origin of English?

#2127
From: Peter Christian
Date: Wed, 06 Jan 1993 23:23
24 lines
1432 bytes
In-Reply-To: <9972@fs3.cam.nist.gov> koontz@cam.nist.gov (John E. Koontz X5180)

> 
> In article <1ie5i1INNlgr@bHARs12c.bnr.co.uk>, sizex@bnr.co.uk (Eric Barber) writes:
> |> one of the striking features of English is its lack of conjugations
> |> and declensions. 
> 
> Actually, English still contains conjugations, though the personal inflection
> of most verbs is very simplified....

> My point is, a language doesn't have to have an elaborate system of 
> tense/aspect varying personal inflections to have conjugational and 
> declensional classes.  

I don't think Eric meant absolute lack, but relative lack,
considering its origins in a highly inflected language, and compared
with its nearest cognates. I mean, it's almost as bad as Chinese!

Peter
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Peter Christian                         
  Dept of European Languages              peter@gold.ac.uk
  Goldsmiths' College, London.            petex@cix.compulink.co.uk
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Technical Details
Message-ID: <memo.846118@cix.compulink.co.uk>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!pipex!demon!cix.compulink.co.uk!petex

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!pipex!demon!cix.compulink.co.uk!petex
Newsgroups: sci.lang
From: petex@cix.compulink.co.uk (Peter Christian)
Subject: Re: Origin of English?
Reply-To: petex@cix.compulink.co.uk
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 1993 23:23:00 +0000
Message-ID: <memo.846118@cix.compulink.co.uk>
Sender: usenet@demon.co.uk
Lines: 25