Article View: sci.lang
Article #2127Re: Origin of English?
From: Peter Christian
Date: Wed, 06 Jan 1993 23:23
Date: Wed, 06 Jan 1993 23:23
24 lines
1432 bytes
1432 bytes
In-Reply-To: <9972@fs3.cam.nist.gov> koontz@cam.nist.gov (John E. Koontz X5180) > > In article <1ie5i1INNlgr@bHARs12c.bnr.co.uk>, sizex@bnr.co.uk (Eric Barber) writes: > |> one of the striking features of English is its lack of conjugations > |> and declensions. > > Actually, English still contains conjugations, though the personal inflection > of most verbs is very simplified.... > My point is, a language doesn't have to have an elaborate system of > tense/aspect varying personal inflections to have conjugational and > declensional classes. I don't think Eric meant absolute lack, but relative lack, considering its origins in a highly inflected language, and compared with its nearest cognates. I mean, it's almost as bad as Chinese! Peter ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Peter Christian Dept of European Languages peter@gold.ac.uk Goldsmiths' College, London. petex@cix.compulink.co.uk ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<memo.846118@cix.compulink.co.uk>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!pipex!demon!cix.compulink.co.uk!petexShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!pipex!demon!cix.compulink.co.uk!petex Newsgroups: sci.lang From: petex@cix.compulink.co.uk (Peter Christian) Subject: Re: Origin of English? Reply-To: petex@cix.compulink.co.uk Date: Wed, 6 Jan 1993 23:23:00 +0000 Message-ID: <memo.846118@cix.compulink.co.uk> Sender: usenet@demon.co.uk Lines: 25