Article View: sci.lang
Article #218Re: Dilemma = Dilemna ??
From: Roger Greenwald
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 1992 23:49
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 1992 23:49
45 lines
2661 bytes
2661 bytes
In article <5207@shum.huji.ac.il> yair@cs.huji.ac.il writes: > [re "dilemna"] >I think this is a common typo. Since n is next to m on qwerty key keyboards this >sort of error is very reasonable. It is also hard to detect beacuse the letters >look very similar. Although I am not an expert in this area (there has been some interesting research on typing and errors in typing), my view is that the proximity of "m" and "n" on the keyboard would NOT lead to this error. Once you have hit "m" once, you have no reason to move your finger, and no way to "miss" the key. It is true that on a _computer_ keyboard, if your finger landed so it depressed both keys, you might get "mn", but you would know that you had only pressed down once, and when you pressed again you would end up with "mnm". If the error were one in which a single "n" were substituted for a single "m," then it might be credible as a typo (e.g. "tane" for "tame" etc.). It is well known, however, that all but the most highly skilled typographers will substitute their own spellings of words they know for different spellings of the same word--without being aware that they are doing so. For example, an American typesetter keying in a manuscript by a British author will have a hard time making sure that he writes "colour" every time he encounters this word. The probability is high that at least a few times he will write "color." This has been a common problem in Norway, where many variant spellings of certain words are "permitted" (officially), where on occasion certain spellings have been "outlawed," and where authors have varied as to which language reforms they have adopted. Close examination of published texts reveals that in many cases an author's spelling has been unwittingly changed by typesetters. So far the evidence suggests that a certain number of library cataloguers have simply had the wrong idea about how "dilemma" is spelled. They may, of coure, have been influenced by a small number of books in which "dilemna" actually appears on the title page. >-- > Yair Friedman. >yair@cs.huji.ac.il >yair@hujinix.BITNET -- Roger Greenwald Greenwald@hf.uib.no (address valid only until 10 August 1992)
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Jul30.234922.1631@alf.uib.no>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!mcsun!sunic!aun.uninett.no!alf.uib.no!hlirgReferences:
<1992Jul28.133921.2894@memstvx1.memst.edu> <1992Jul28.195327.14154@alf.uib.no> <5207@shum.huji.ac.il>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: sci.lang Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!mcsun!sunic!aun.uninett.no!alf.uib.no!hlirg From: hlirg@alf.uib.no (Roger Greenwald) Subject: Re: Dilemma = Dilemna ?? Message-ID: <1992Jul30.234922.1631@alf.uib.no> Organization: University of Bergen, Norway References: <1992Jul28.133921.2894@memstvx1.memst.edu> <1992Jul28.195327.14154@alf.uib.no> <5207@shum.huji.ac.il> Date: Thu, 30 Jul 92 23:49:22 GMT Lines: 42