Article View: sci.lang
Article #2255Re: Morphological development of the genitive case in German
From: Peter Christian
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1993 00:05
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1993 00:05
46 lines
2476 bytes
2476 bytes
In-Reply-To: <1993Jan11.090344.4952@memstvx1.memst.edu> connolly@memstvx1.memst.edu > > There is a problem here: in German compounding, masculines and neuters > generally do not add -s, though some do. Conversely, while many femi- > nines do add -s, many others do not: nouns in -e more usually add > -n or else drop the -e. True enough, but I was concerned to find *some* analogy which would explain the -s-, and although it may be true that they *generally* do not (though I'd like to see the statistics), usage is so fluid that I don't think it's a fatal objection > And a second problem: genitives can still precede nouns in German, as > the second example above proves (it's the title of a play written after > the Second World War). Ah yes, but it's surely recognized as archaic/literary, certainly not everyday usage. > > A final mystery is why *all* German feminines lack genitive -s. In Indo- > European, the morphology of masculine and feminine i-stems was identical, > and had -s, > as may readily be seen by looking at Greek and Latin. But in Old High > German they're different for some reason. To wit: > > Masc. Fem. > Nom. Sing. gast 'guest' anst 'favor' > Gen. Sing. gastes ensti > Nom. Plural gesti ensti > > Somehow -s survived in the masculine, but not in the feminine. Apparently > the patterning of *other* masc. resp. fem. categories is to blame. Could the answer lie in the coalescence of the masc. a-stems and i-stems in the singular? Perhaps the fem has the `correct' reflex of IE *-eis and the masc has taken over the reflex of *-os from the a-stems. Just a thought, I haven't checked the phonology. Peter ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Peter Christian Dept of European Languages peter@gold.ac.uk Goldsmiths' College, London. petex@cix.compulink.co.uk ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<memo.857761@cix.compulink.co.uk>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!pipex!demon!cix.compulink.co.uk!petexShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!pipex!demon!cix.compulink.co.uk!petex Newsgroups: sci.lang From: petex@cix.compulink.co.uk (Peter Christian) Subject: Re: Morphological development of the genitive case in German Reply-To: petex@cix.compulink.co.uk Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1993 00:05:00 +0000 Message-ID: <memo.857761@cix.compulink.co.uk> Sender: usenet@demon.co.uk Lines: 47