Article View: sci.lang
Article #2261Re: Proto-languages: what are the rules?
From: Rich Alderson
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1993 01:57
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1993 01:57
43 lines
3115 bytes
3115 bytes
In article <1993Jan9.005144.10836@midway.uchicago.edu>, deb5@ellis (Daniel von Brighoff) writes:
>As a linguistics undergrad at the University of Chicago, I learned that the
>principle balancing out "majority rules" is "phonetic plausibility." Applying
>this to the Romance example, we notice that although there are several
>documented cases of the change /k/ -> /s/,/sh/ (e.g. the division of
>Proto-Indo-European into `centum' and s'atem languages, based on whether
>inherited */k/ remains /k/ (as in Italic) or palatalises to /sh/ (as in
>Slavic)), there is no (to my knowledge) example of a regular change in the
>reverse direction, i.e. /s/ becoming /k/. Thus, we decide on a /k/ to /s/
>change as being the only plausible explanation. So think of "plausiblity" as
>being a more general "majority rules" principle which serves to limit the
>first one.
Talk to Eric Hamp about the Albanian change I mentioned in my followup to this
query.
>Now, the downside: if this argument seems circular, it's because (as faras
>this example goes), it is. Many of our guidelines for phonetic plausiblity
>were developed through work on the Indo-European languages, in large part
>because it afforded written sources old enough for us to check our hypotheses
>(and, of course, Europeans were the first to use it extensively). However, if
>certain phonetic changes common to I-E turn out to be _specific_ to it, we may
>become guilty of overgeneralisation in our attempts to see them at work in
>other language families.
With the amount of work that has been done in, for example, the languages of
the Americas, I think any overgeneralizations would have come to light 50 years
or more ago. _Pace_ some readers of this newsgroup, linguists *as a group* are
not so hide-bound as to reject evidence set before them in systematic fashion.
>After all, like most sciences, historical reconstruction is still an inexact
>one (which is why them *'s come in so darn handy : >).
The inexactitude lies not in the science, but in the historicity, of the
discipline.
But sometimes I wish that the asterisk was in the home row on my keyboard. :->
--
Rich Alderson 'I wish life was not so short,' he thought. 'Languages take
such a time, and so do all the things one wants to know about.'
--J. R. R. Tolkien,
alderson@leland.stanford.edu _The Lost Road_
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1993Jan12.015701.23372@leland.Stanford.EDU>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!stanford.edu!nntp.Stanford.EDU!aldersonReferences:
<1k3wmj#3X2tH88WtzQs7tp3yw6svQZq=cowan@snark.thyrsus.com> <1993Jan9.005144.10836@midway.uchicago.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: sci.lang Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!stanford.edu!nntp.Stanford.EDU!alderson From: alderson@cisco.com (Rich Alderson) Subject: Re: Proto-languages: what are the rules? In-Reply-To: deb5@ellis.uchicago.edu (Daniel von Brighoff) Message-ID: <1993Jan12.015701.23372@leland.Stanford.EDU> Originator: alderson@leland.Stanford.EDU Sender: news@leland.Stanford.EDU (Mr News) Reply-To: alderson@cisco.com (Rich Alderson) Organization: Cisco Systems (MIS) References: <1k3wmj#3X2tH88WtzQs7tp3yw6svQZq=cowan@snark.thyrsus.com> <1993Jan9.005144.10836@midway.uchicago.edu> Date: Tue, 12 Jan 93 01:57:01 GMT Lines: 43