🚀 go-pugleaf

> 	A story that illustrates British  linguistic snobbery is
> told by Alistair Cooke (I think - I'm not 100% sure  I remember
> the source) is of a play performed in London where the part of
> Napoleon Buonaparte was played by an American actor.  Most critics
> lambasted  the play, saying how ludicrous it was to have Napoleon
> speaking with an American accent.  It was not until a week later
> that a single letter appeared in the newspaper pointing out that
> it was no more ludicrous than Napoleon speaking with a British
> accent, since Napoleon actually spoke French! 
> -- 
> Bill Tanenbaum - AT&T Bell Labs - Naperville IL  ihnp4!ihlpg!tan

	From the little work I have in community theater, I would
tend to say that the casting of the American might have been a poor 
choice.  Since in London a British accent is what the British expect
to hear, it would not seem strange to see a play in which all the
actors spoke with a British accent, no matter who they were
portraying.  However, if the single actor in the play without a
British accent, the American, is playing Napoleon with an American
accent, then I can see how that might be distracting, and take away
something from his character, and the play. 

	Now, if he used a French accent, or the actor in question
had been French, I would think the critics would have never
mentioned it.


		I still can't believe people get pay for acting.


...ihnp4!ll1!cej			Llewellyn Jones