Article View: sci.lang
Article #2477Re: Using C to describe itself
From: mouse
Date: Thu, 07 May 1987 08:39
Date: Thu, 07 May 1987 08:39
11 lines
1048 bytes
1048 bytes
In article <1286@arthur.cs.purdue.edu>, sjc@arthur.cs.purdue.edu (Steve Chapin) writes: > But, the point is, that the original compiler and all its descendants > were NOT (!!!!!) actual C compilers, since the did NOT correctly > transform all proper inputs into equivalent outputs. So, this > example is not relevant. By this definition there are no C compilers in existence. der Mouse (mouse@mcgill-vision.uucp)
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<764@mcgill-vision.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!rutgers!ames!oliveb!pyramid!prls!philabs!micomvax!musocs!mcgill-vision!mouseReferences:
<437@haddock.UUCP} <1829@enea.UUCP> <440@haddock.UUCP> <1286@arthur.cs.purdue.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!rutgers!ames!oliveb!pyramid!prls!philabs!micomvax!musocs!mcgill-vision!mouse From: mouse@mcgill-vision.UUCP Newsgroups: sci.lang,comp.lang.misc Subject: Re: Using C to describe itself Message-ID: <764@mcgill-vision.UUCP> Date: Thu, 7-May-87 04:39:40 EDT Article-I.D.: mcgill-v.764 Posted: Thu May 7 04:39:40 1987 Date-Received: Thu, 14-May-87 01:34:57 EDT References: <437@haddock.UUCP} <1829@enea.UUCP> <440@haddock.UUCP> <1286@arthur.cs.purdue.edu> Organization: McGill University, Montreal Lines: 11