Article View: sci.lang
Article #2606Re: Syntactical *definition* of English
From: Steven Ryan
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 1988 23:27
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 1988 23:27
17 lines
1023 bytes
1023 bytes
>You may remember that Context Free Languages were discovered by a
>Linguist, Noam Chomsky, not a computer scientist. At the time (mid
>......
Eh?
I think somebody forgot Type 0 = Turing Machine.
Anyway, check out Appendix ?B of Terry Winograd's book, some or other,
Part I: Syntax.
No, nobody has a complete, formal syntax/semantics of any natural language,
but, you said you wanted it for a game? this kind of stuff covers most cases.
For what it doesn't, just respond
Eh? I'm sorry, I don't understand; could you repeat that using
simpler sentence?
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1625@garth.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!lll-tis!mordor!joyce!sri-unix!garth!smryanReferences:
<726@wsccs.UUCP> <6946@orstcs.CS.ORST.EDU>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!lll-tis!mordor!joyce!sri-unix!garth!smryan From: smryan@garth.UUCP (Steven Ryan) Newsgroups: sci.lang,comp.lang.misc Subject: Re: Syntactical *definition* of English Message-ID: <1625@garth.UUCP> Date: 20 Oct 88 23:27:33 GMT References: <726@wsccs.UUCP> <6946@orstcs.CS.ORST.EDU> Reply-To: smryan@garth.UUCP (Steven Ryan) Organization: INTERGRAPH (APD) -- Palo Alto, CA Lines: 16