Article View: sci.lang
Article #2698Re: Spelling and Perceptual Mode (was: Effects of poor writing?)
From: Jeff Hunter
Date: Wed, 17 May 1989 02:02
Date: Wed, 17 May 1989 02:02
47 lines
2792 bytes
2792 bytes
see1@tank.uchicago.edu (Ellen Keyne Seebacher) writes:
>
> I learned quite a few rules by making and studying lists of similar
> words. In almost all expert activities, the *really* good performers
> are those who can glance at a large arrangement and grasp a pattern.
> And like playing chess, spelling is something you learn by doing until
> you *feel* the patterns.
Ok, but why *should* spelling be as tough as chess. One of my
co-workers tells me that Italian spelling is easy enough that his pre-school
daughters already know all the rules and exceptions.
raymond@utpsych.toronto.edu (Raymond Shaw) writes:
>
> The thing to remember about all of this nonsense about reforming orthography
> is that English is comprised of words from many other languages, and the
> spelling of many of the words remains little changed from the original.
> The beauty of this is that intelligent people (go ahead, flame me on this
> one, I'm looking forward to it), that's right, I said it, INTELLIGENT people
> can look at a word they don't know, and make logical guesses about the meaning
> of the word, because of its spelling, which reflects the original language.
Well you used to be able to tell the subject of a volume measurement
by the units used. Gallon = water, pint = beer or blood, bushel = leaves or
grain, hogshead = beer again, barrel = oil, gill = medicine or liquor, and
cord = wood. In general these have been discarded (except in some barbaric
parts of the world :-).
Why should millions of man-years be wasted to preserve etymology?
There's easier ways to do it.
> Finally, if you want to change spelling so that it matches pronunciation,
> on whose pronunciation would you base it?
Well you could at least remove things that were archaic even when
the first dictionary was penned.
I think tonite I'll drive-thru Dunkin Do-nuts, rite?
*not* I think toni<cough>te I'll drive thro<hack> dunkin<gahh>
do<clear phlem> nou<wheeze>ts, ri<final cough>te?
--
___ __ __ {utzoo,lsuc}!censor!jeff (416-595-2705)
/ / /) / ) -- my opinions --
-/ _ -/- /- No one born with a mouth and a need is innocent.
(__/ (/_/ _/_ Greg Bear
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<600@censor.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!censor!jeffReferences:
<39131@bbn.COM> <1982@trantor.harris-atd.com> <187@intek01.UUCP> <1989May10.211236.19705@utpsych.toronto.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!censor!jeff From: jeff@censor.UUCP (Jeff Hunter) Newsgroups: sci.lang,comp.cog-eng,sci.psychology Subject: Re: Spelling and Perceptual Mode (was: Effects of poor writing?) Summary: some odd reasons Keywords: GB Shaw, orthography Message-ID: <600@censor.UUCP> Date: 17 May 89 02:02:13 GMT References: <39131@bbn.COM> <1982@trantor.harris-atd.com> <187@intek01.UUCP> <1989May10.211236.19705@utpsych.toronto.edu> Distribution: na Organization: Bell Canada, Business Development, Toronto Lines: 47