🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: sci.lang
Article #2940

Re: Northern/Southern Cal linguistic split

#2940
From: Mark R. Miller
Date: Thu, 05 May 1994 22:28
32 lines
2504 bytes
In article <CpAuxo.31K@ucdavis.edu>, hill@madrone.ece.ucdavis.edu (Rich Hill) writes:
|> In article <2q97e7$mlp@kraz.usc.edu> karl@kraz.usc.edu (Karl Geiger) writes:
|> >This is anecdotal, but here goes:
|> >
|> >Roughly speaking, a freeway is a high-speed, limited access roadway.
|> >Limited access means no crossroads, parking, and travel is restricted
|> >to vehicles that can maintain speeds > 45 mph (yep, the CHP cites
|> >folks going too slowly).  Older on-ramps still have posted signs
|> >reading "PEDESTRIANS, BICYCLES, MOTOR-DRIVEN CYCLES PROHIBITED".
|> >
|> >Between Santa Barbara and Ventura, stretches of the road are the ONLY
|> >way to get between points, so I think the State relaxes vehicle
|> >restrictions; consequently, the highway is no longer a freeway and
|> >cyclists cannot get ticketed for riding it.  
|> 
|> 
|> Bicycles are allowed on freeways if there is no other easy option.  There is
|> no need to make that portion of road a highway instead of a freeway.  
|> Portions of I-80 in the Sierras and Hwy 1 near Morro Bay (among others)
|> are freeway but allow bicycles.

I don't know about the 'exception' you mention in the Sierras but Karl is 
absolutely right.

|> 
|> Usually, the reason for the END FREEWAY signs is simply because of an
|> intersection with a minor road that is not limited access (no bridge, 
|> onramps, etc.)
|> 
and that makes it a 'highway' rather than a freeway.

                dblpmrm@unocal.com
Technical Details
Message-ID: <CpCp3C.9M2@unocal.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmd.de!nntp.gmd.de!xlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!MathWorks.Com!mvb.saic.com!unogate!dblpmrm
References: <2on072$bud@rome.raynet.com> <2q7el0$lhj@gap.cco.caltech.edu> <2q97e7$mlp@kraz.usc.edu> <CpAuxo.31K@ucdavis.edu>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: fd3ff,899d5058dc4d426a
X-Google-Attributes: gidfd3ff,public
X-Google-Thread: 10001a,899d5058dc4d426a
X-Google-Attributes: gid10001a,public
X-Google-Thread: 10a20a,3991695550f96f40
X-Google-Attributes: gid10a20a,public
X-Google-Thread: 107d03,3991695550f96f40
X-Google-Attributes: gid107d03,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-05-05 15:28:23 PST
Newsgroups: sci.lang,ca.driving,ba.transportation,la.general
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmd.de!nntp.gmd.de!xlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!MathWorks.Com!mvb.saic.com!unogate!dblpmrm
From: dblpmrm@mayan.NoSubdomain.NoDomain (Mark R. Miller)
Subject: Re: Northern/Southern Cal linguistic split
Message-ID: <CpCp3C.9M2@unocal.com>
Sender: dblpmrm@mayan (Mark R. Miller)
Organization: Unocal Corporation
References: <2on072$bud@rome.raynet.com> <2q7el0$lhj@gap.cco.caltech.edu> <2q97e7$mlp@kraz.usc.edu> <CpAuxo.31K@ucdavis.edu>
Distribution: na
Date: Thu, 5 May 1994 22:28:23 GMT
Lines: 32