Article View: sci.lang
Article #2950Re: Northern/Southern Cal linguistic split
From: David S. Broudy
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 1994 21:34
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 1994 21:34
39 lines
2932 bytes
2932 bytes
In article <2ogulg$3qt@kaiwan.kaiwan.com> perew@kaiwan.com (Mark Perew) writes: > The problem with refering to freeways by name, at least in SoCal, is that > the names and numbers don't always correspond. For example, "The San > Diego Freeway" applies to all of the 405 and parts of the 5. The 5 > carries other names (Santa Ana Freeway, Golden State Highway) which I > find confusing. > Try the "Hollywood" freeway. It's the 101 until it hits the 170 in North Hollywood, where the 101 becomes the Ventura freeway and the 170 becomes the Hollywood freeway even though it goes nowhere near Hollywood (North Hollywood doesn't count). And the 134 is the Ventura freeway, til you get to the 101/170 split where it disappears, then the 101 resumes being the Ventura freeway. Huh? In article <2ofj7f$apt@engnews2.Eng.Sun.COM> landauer@morocco.Eng.Sun.COM (Doug Landauer) writes: > Maybe the only people that Pam knows in L.A. are non-natives; it always > seemed to me that those were the people who use "the" with the highway > number. Everyone I knew always used the common names for most of the > freeways, especially the older ones. > Maybe you just didn't know the right people :) I'm a native and most everyone I know, except for those whose first language is not English, uses "the" before the actual number. It sounds a little odd (to me) to say "Yeah, take 110 to 101, then get on 170." Except for I-5 and PCH, most of us here use the article. Few use the actual freeway name in LA, although I think it's more common to do that in Orange County. They have a short one named after Richard Nixon, you know. ------------ broudy@mizar.usc.edu "My life has a superb cast but I can't figure out the plot." --Ashleigh Brilliant
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<2ohoh1$sli@usc.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!bga.com!news.sprintlink.net!hookup!yeshua.marcam.com!MathWorks.Com!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!howland.reston.ans.net!cs.utexas.edu!usc!usenetReferences:
<2oeuct$sjt@mizar.usc.edu> <2ofb3l$30p@kraz.usc.edu> <Co6nEC.Dsy@unix.portal.com> <Co6rvM.sw@cnn.nas.nasa.gov> <2ogulg$3qt@kaiwan.kaiwan.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: fd3ff,899d5058dc4d426a X-Google-Attributes: gidfd3ff,public X-Google-Thread: 10a20a,3991695550f96f40 X-Google-Attributes: gid10a20a,public X-Google-Thread: 10001a,899d5058dc4d426a X-Google-Attributes: gid10001a,public X-Google-Thread: 107d03,3991695550f96f40 X-Google-Attributes: gid107d03,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-04-13 14:52:15 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!bga.com!news.sprintlink.net!hookup!yeshua.marcam.com!MathWorks.Com!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!howland.reston.ans.net!cs.utexas.edu!usc!usenet From: broudy@mizar.usc.edu (David S. Broudy) Newsgroups: sci.lang,ca.driving,ba.transportation,la.general Subject: Re: Northern/Southern Cal linguistic split Date: 13 Apr 1994 21:34:25 GMT Organization: University of Southern California Lines: 39 Sender: broudy@usc.edu Message-ID: <2ohoh1$sli@usc.edu> References: <2oeuct$sjt@mizar.usc.edu> <2ofb3l$30p@kraz.usc.edu> <Co6nEC.Dsy@unix.portal.com> <Co6rvM.sw@cnn.nas.nasa.gov> <2ogulg$3qt@kaiwan.kaiwan.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: wpc-3.usc.edu X-Posted-From: InterNews 1.0.1b22@wpc-3.usc.edu X-Authenticated: broudy on INN host usc.edu