🚀 go-pugleaf

Mark Rosenfelder wrote:
> 
> In article <38222D19.7EF0DD27@dtn.ntl.com>,
> Ian Molton  <oddity@mad.scientist.com> wrote:
> >"D. Edward Gund v. Brighoff" wrote:
> >>
> >> NOTE FOLLOW-UPS!  In almost everyone of my posts to this thread, I've set
> >> them to sci.lang *only*, but people keep changing them back when they re-
> >> ply.  This discussion is not on topic for bit.listerv.autism and should
> >> not be continued there.
> >
> >Well, either you're lying or your software doesnt work. Several of your
> >posts made it DIRECTLY here.
> 
> Learn how Usenet works before making foolish accusations.  Daniel did
> set follow-ups; here's what they look like in my newsreader:
>   Followup-To: sci.lang

Im well aware of how it works. Im writing a newsreader, so perhaps youd
like to get your facts straight.

> This doesn't mean that his posts didn't appear in the autism group:
> that's not what setting follow-ups means.  It means that a proper
> newsreader will send responses only to the named groups.

he didnt say followups. yes, i send this back to the group I read. I
wont see the response if I dont. I cant afford to read online, and im
buggered if im going to download the whole of sci.lang (and, since I
have to read offline due to cost I cant download just headers) just for
one reply. if he wanted to restrict discussion to sci.lang he should
HAVE POSTED THERE.

> Your own post included the autism group again; the charitable explanation
> is that your own newsreader is broken, and ignored the follow-ups line.

see above.

This is WAY off topic now. just dont reply, ok?