Article View: sci.lang
Article #300Re: Native speaker wins one, loses one [was Re: C
From: Michael Zeleny
Date: Thu, 06 Aug 1992 14:49
Date: Thu, 06 Aug 1992 14:49
76 lines
2700 bytes
2700 bytes
In article <1992Aug1.044753.2975@Princeton.EDU> mikulska@astro.Princeton.EDU (Margaret Mikulska) writes: >In article <1992Jul30.112236.14313@husc3.harvard.edu> >zeleny@husc10.harvard.edu (Michael Zeleny) writes: MZ: >>Unfortunately, the extent of my syntactical authority is limited to >>the qualification of a native speaker. Even that could be challenged >>by someone who believes in first language attrition. MM: >I believe, and I challenge. :-) MZ: >>If you want an >informed opinion, ask me about semantics. MM: >Agreed. MZ: >>plural accusative: yablok >>plural genitive: yabloki >> >>[...] >> >> *v Kieve zoloto bylo polno >> GEN >> >> v Kieve zolota bylo polno >> ACC MM: >No, no, no. You keep confusing genitive with accusative (and vice >versa). You are absolutely right. MM: >GENITIVE (roditel'nyj padezh): you ask "kogo? chego?", >hence: > Chego net? Zolota; yablok. > Kogo net? Mixaila. > >And therefore also: Chego/kogo bylo polno v Kieve? Zolota; ix. >GENITIVE, without any doubt. > >ACCUSATIVE (vinitel'nyj padezh): you ask "kogo? shto?", >hence: > Shto ty vidish? Zoloto; yabloki. > Kogo ty vidish? Mixaila. > >(I decided to transliterate the Russian 'g' in "kogo" as /g/, despite >of its pronunciation as /v/.) Of course: it is the accusative case that coincides with the nominative form for inanimate objects. MM: >My wild guess is that a possible source of your confusion is the order in >which cases are listed in grammar books: sometimes acc. is listed as >the second case, after nom. (probably because acc. and nom. are often >the same), sometimes it's gen. that is listed as the second case, >followed by dat., and then acc. No excuse is available to me. At least I may be allowed to plead attrition of grade school grammar, rather than that of linguistic performance. As an extenuating circumstance I adduce 15 years of nearly uninflected language degradation. Mea culpa. >-Margaret >mikulska@astro.princeton.edu remorsefully, mikhail zeleny@husc.harvard.edu "Un de mes plus grands plaisirs est de jurer Dieu quand je bande."
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Aug6.104931.14471@husc3.harvard.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!caen!kuhub.cc.ukans.edu!husc-news.harvard.edu!husc10.harvard.edu!zelenyReferences:
<1992Jul30.112236.14313@husc3.harvard.edu> <1992Aug1.044753.2975@Princeton.EDU>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!caen!kuhub.cc.ukans.edu!husc-news.harvard.edu!husc10.harvard.edu!zeleny Newsgroups: sci.lang Subject: Re: Native speaker wins one, loses one [was Re: C Message-ID: <1992Aug6.104931.14471@husc3.harvard.edu> From: zeleny@husc10.harvard.edu (Michael Zeleny) Date: 6 Aug 92 10:49:29 EDT References: <1992Jul30.112236.14313@husc3.harvard.edu> <1992Aug1.044753.2975@Princeton.EDU> Organization: Harvard University Science Center Nntp-Posting-Host: husc10.harvard.edu Lines: 77