🚀 go-pugleaf

On Jan 19, 8:55 pm, "Paul J Kriha" <paul.nospam.kr...@paradise.net.nz>
wrote:
> "Peter T. Daniels" <gramma...@verizon.net> wrote in messagenews:14953b33-6cf9-452a-b0a7-9f49641b5443@v67g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
>
>
>
>
>
> >On Jan 19, 11:07 am, Joachim Pense <s...@pense-mainz.eu> wrote:
> >> Am Sat, 19 Jan 2008 05:37:57 -0800 (PST) schrieb Peter T. Daniels:
> >> > On Jan 19, 1:04 am, "Paul J Kriha" <paul.nospam.kr...@paradise.net.nz>
> >> > wrote:
> >> >> "ah" <splifing...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> >> >>news:479171c8$0$35900$892e0abb@auth.newsreader.octanews.com...
> >> >>> Paul J Kriha wrote:
> >> >>> > "ah" <splifing...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> >> >>> >news:478fa645$0$40778$892e0abb@auth.newsreader.octanews.com...
> >> >>> >> Paul J Kriha wrote:
> >> >>> >> > "ah" <splifing...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> >> >>> >> >news:478f085a$0$35876$892e0abb@auth.newsreader.octanews.com...
> >> >>> >> >> Paul J Kriha wrote:
> >> >>> >> >> > "Peter T. Daniels" <gramma...@verizon.net> wrote in message
> >> >>> >> >> >news:eaf1e612-6a9c-401e-8280-6b96a2669e93@s13g2000prd.googlegroups.com...
> >> >>> >> >> >>On Jan 16, 1:53 pm, Enrico Ramstein <m...@privacy.net> wrote:
> >> >>> >> >> >>> "Peter T. Daniels" <gramma...@verizon.net> wrote:
>
> >> >>> >> >> >>> > > I was genuinely shocked that Lot had not only committed incest, but
> >> >>> >> >> >>> > > done it on top of a grave.
>
> >> >>> >> >> >>> > (a) If there actually was a real person "Lot" who actually did what
> >> >>> >> >> >>> > the story says, at that particular spot, how would he have known there
> >> >>> >> >> >>> > was a burial there a millennium and more earlier?
>
> >> >>> >> >> >>> "Here lies X." carved on a stone.
>
> >> >>> >> >> >>Oh, really? Who was writing inscriptions (of any sort) in 3000 BCE?
>
> >> >>> >> >> > Perhaps "Here lies X" in late pictographic Magdalenian??
>
> >> >>> >> >> Perhaps a mere rock.
>
> >> >>> >> > I see, you mean a genuine idiomatic Swiss idiolect of late Magdalenian.
>
> >> >>> >> No. A rock.
>
> >> >>> > How do you tell the difference?
>
> >> >>> The rock just sits there looking like a rock.
>
> >> >> :-)))
> >> >> Well, that's exactly my point. How different from that does
> >> >> look a rock with a 3000BC inscription in Magdalenian?
>
> >> > You left out a zero.
>
> :-)) No, I don't think I did. Counting carefully the >'s I think it
> was you who said earlier:
>
> >> >>> >> >> >>Oh, really? Who was writing inscriptions (of any sort) in 3000 BCE?

That referred to "Enrico Ramstein"'s "a millennium or more before" the
putative time of Lot.

> That's why I called it "late Magdalenian". Don't tell me nothing
> recognizable can be *that* late (27,000 years). As we all know
> with Magdalenian, absolutely anything is possible,
> in fact it's very likely.
>
> >> Is there a Zero in Magdalenian writing?
>
> >You'll have to ask Franz. There are, however, four zeroes in "30,000."
>
> Of course Magdalenians had pictograms for Zero.
> There are many blank rock faces in Lascaux. They convey
> powerful messages like
> "Today we again saw *zero* giraffes, and killed *zero* pigs", and
> "Therefore, tonight we again have *zero* ribs for dinner", and
> "And get *zero* cuddles as the reward from our women", and
> "We are hungry, just as well the *zeroes* are so easy to carve".

Too many cartoons. Everyone knows the hunter-gatherer way of life was
easier than the agri-pastoralist way of life!