Article View: sci.lang
Article #3376Re: internet languages (English rules?)
From: Jarmo Puntanen
Date: Mon, 05 Feb 1996 00:00
Date: Mon, 05 Feb 1996 00:00
56 lines
3170 bytes
3170 bytes
In article <Pine.SOL.3.91.960201135844.3978B-100000@rask>, Jens Stengaard Larsen <jens@cphling.dk> wrote: >On 30 Jan 1996, Jarmo Puntanen wrote: > >> So, I gather the _means_ of communicating about the EU seems to be of pri= >me=20 >> importance to a good share of the audience, rather that what is actually >> communicated? > >Of course the means are more important than the ends. They always are. >Any idiot can put up with something everybody would agree to fight for. >Few idiots can suggest how to do it. Pardon me, but I somehow failed to see the your point. Can you elaborate on why the _mode_ of communication always overruns the contents, in your opinion? >> I do not regard the language essential.=20 > >But it _is_ essential whether you like it or not. How would you do without >it?=20 Poorly, must admit. But the can be no single 'holy' language that would somehow solve all communication problems within the EU. To think so is, I think, naive. If your end is to further the political unification of the EU by coining a synthetic Eurolang, please present the idea as such and do not camouflage it under any quasilinguistic pretext. >> >Remember, this is going to be a permanent business. Nobody is going >> >to give up before either the Federation or some alternative has been >> >established. >>=20 >> I liked that 'or some alternative' part. 'A permanent business' >> does not thrill me at all, there's a definite echo of iron boots >> around when you say so. > >Another example of a `permanent business' could be the constitution of a=20 >country. But maybe you're also against having a written constitution? Certainly not! An independent state with its own written constitution, modifiable by its own legistlative bodies, has always been close to my heart, perhaps because I once lived in a fairly successful one until someone stole my country's sovereignty (Jan 1st, 1995). -- Jarmo Puntanen ccjapu@uta.fi ccjapu@mailhost.great.fi (liiketoimet/business) @ Irjalankatu 54 D 22 33560 TRE & int + 358 +(9)31-3564242
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<4f502r$ckt@kielo.uta.fi>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<4bk4cv$mdk@globe.indirect.com> <4eau60$lnh@balder.adm.ku.dk> <4elfej$p8e@kielo.uta.fi> <Pine.SOL.3.91.960201135844.3978B-100000@rask>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 11578d,c7f86f0010ea9240 X-Google-Attributes: gid11578d,public X-Google-Thread: fa448,eac043ec93053a21 X-Google-Attributes: gidfa448,public X-Google-Thread: 102dad,eac043ec93053a21 X-Google-Attributes: gid102dad,public X-Google-Thread: 102cce,eac043ec93053a21 X-Google-Attributes: gid102cce,public X-Google-Thread: 1058af,c7f86f0010ea9240 X-Google-Attributes: gid1058af,public X-Google-Thread: 10a20a,eac043ec93053a21 X-Google-Attributes: gid10a20a,public From: ccjapu@uta.fi (Jarmo Puntanen) Subject: Re: internet languages (English rules?) Date: 1996/02/05 Message-ID: <4f502r$ckt@kielo.uta.fi> X-Deja-AN: 138036570 distribution: world references: <4bk4cv$mdk@globe.indirect.com> <4eau60$lnh@balder.adm.ku.dk> <4elfej$p8e@kielo.uta.fi> <Pine.SOL.3.91.960201135844.3978B-100000@rask> organization: University of Tampere, Finland newsgroups: sci.lang,alt.uu.lang.misc,eunet.politics,soc.culture.europe,alt.politics.europe.misc,talk.politics.european-union