Article View: sci.lang
Article #5087Re: Proof that 'Shakespeare' was Edward de Vere, Earl of Oxford
From: lackpurity
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2010 17:12
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2010 17:12
51 lines
4519 bytes
4519 bytes
On Mar 29, 12:01�pm, Franz Gnaedinger <f...@bluemail.ch> wrote: > On Mar 29, 6:30�pm, lackpurity <lackpur...@yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > Elizabeth does use reproaches in her withering denunciations of the > > Earl of Oxford. �I think she hyperbolizes on that, as the Earl did > > gain some credit, and Edmund Spenser pointed this out to the world. > > Eddie de Vere lacked sufficient writing talent. �Oxfordians just > > dismiss all the Anti-Oxfordian evidence as a result of some massive > > conspiracy and subsequent coverup. �It's up to the sagacity of the > > readers. �Oxfordians still lack evidence for their case. �This is not > > to say that Oxfordian fantasies, or even Marlovian fantasies, i.e. of > > Peter Farey's ilk, do not appeal to some. �Elizabeth is a staunch > > Baconian. > > I don't agree on the missing writing talent, in the early > poems by de Vere I find the same breadth while his > later lines are more versatile, which I ascribe to the > influence of William Shakespeare the actor and > congenial collaborator - both your poets. Your opinion is noted. I don't agree. I propose > a new idea about the authorship, didn't you notice? You mean a collaboration with Eddie de Vere? > And my evidence I find within the plays and poems. > I pose you the same question: what does the scene > in Titus Andronicus mean where Young Lucius quotes > two lines by Horace (which you translated completely > wrongly) and calls them his weapon? If I have time, I'll try to find it, again. How can two > lines by an ancient poet be a weapon? This makes > sense within my interpretation of the play as political > allegory. I published my new and fresh interpretations > of five plays. If you got evidence against them, show me, > and focus on the most important point, as I can't handle > five arguments at once. Michael Martin
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<eda0f83c-a193-4566-b1ab-3bd59e387f68@g28g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!g28g2000yqh.googlegroups.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<f756c0f3-dccb-4b35-aa17-e97bd516cb2a@o3g2000yqb.googlegroups.com> <d1d16518-5e63-4913-983e-4d7f63a413c9@o3g2000yqb.googlegroups.com> <cd9cdf50-2dbc-4944-9958-f7d004d700c9@j27g2000yqn.googlegroups.com> <cd8a5033-88e1-4401-9616-9a23d56e747f@e1g2000yqh.googlegroups.com> <8331e4f1-8aaa-4b51-9c26-5122d3d48199@b9g2000pri.googlegroups.com> <3fb80826-8c2f-4817-ab91-c470d442d658@q21g2000yqm.googlegroups.com> <910f5387-9b4c-4696-96c3-2a9645047d70@q21g2000yqm.googlegroups.com> <edPmn.304326$tJ.172997@newsfe28.ams2> <9b1fcd63-66de-48e7-b149-c9d0aa6d6ddc@v20g2000yqv.googlegroups.com> <45c386c2-d401-4d4c-b3e9-8ac835922adc@n39g2000prj.googlegroups.com> <298a8c4c-966e-4680-ac60-9187275a1fde@g28g2000yqh.googlegroups.com> <490805aa-6b00-49bb-8f5e-ecc369c5fc33@x12g2000yqx.googlegroups.com> <8ebf519e-7204-4e6a-a758-84efbc8e3d3e@33g2000yqj.googlegroups.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 10a20a,e31868f142332de6 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Thread: 113168,e31868f142332de6 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gid3b3257e996,gid275bb0c91e,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,UTF8 Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!g28g2000yqh.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: lackpurity <lackpurity@yahoo.com> Newsgroups: sci.lang,humanities.lit.authors.shakespeare Subject: Re: Proof that 'Shakespeare' was Edward de Vere, Earl of Oxford Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2010 10:12:51 -0700 (PDT) Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 51 Message-ID: <eda0f83c-a193-4566-b1ab-3bd59e387f68@g28g2000yqh.googlegroups.com> References: <f756c0f3-dccb-4b35-aa17-e97bd516cb2a@o3g2000yqb.googlegroups.com> <d1d16518-5e63-4913-983e-4d7f63a413c9@o3g2000yqb.googlegroups.com> <cd9cdf50-2dbc-4944-9958-f7d004d700c9@j27g2000yqn.googlegroups.com> <cd8a5033-88e1-4401-9616-9a23d56e747f@e1g2000yqh.googlegroups.com> <8331e4f1-8aaa-4b51-9c26-5122d3d48199@b9g2000pri.googlegroups.com> <3fb80826-8c2f-4817-ab91-c470d442d658@q21g2000yqm.googlegroups.com> <910f5387-9b4c-4696-96c3-2a9645047d70@q21g2000yqm.googlegroups.com> <edPmn.304326$tJ.172997@newsfe28.ams2> <9b1fcd63-66de-48e7-b149-c9d0aa6d6ddc@v20g2000yqv.googlegroups.com> <45c386c2-d401-4d4c-b3e9-8ac835922adc@n39g2000prj.googlegroups.com> <298a8c4c-966e-4680-ac60-9187275a1fde@g28g2000yqh.googlegroups.com> <490805aa-6b00-49bb-8f5e-ecc369c5fc33@x12g2000yqx.googlegroups.com> <8ebf519e-7204-4e6a-a758-84efbc8e3d3e@33g2000yqj.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.12.116.144 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1269882771 2648 127.0.0.1 (29 Mar 2010 17:12:51 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2010 17:12:51 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: g28g2000yqh.googlegroups.com; posting-host=64.12.116.144; posting-account=mVPLJggAAAD7D8Gi_sDlKsyO8Z6rJJSG User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-Via: HTTP/1.1 (Velocity/3.1.1.5 [uScMs f p eN:t cCMp s ]), HTTP/1.0 spider-mtc-te09.proxy.aol.com[400C7089] (Prism/1.2.1), HTTP/1.1 cache-mtc-ac15.proxy.aol.com[400C7490] (Traffic-Server/6.1.5 [uScM]) X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; AOL 9.5; AOLBuild 4337.185; Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; Trident/4.0; GTB6.4; SLCC2; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET CLR 3.0.30729; Media Center PC 6.0; eSobiSubscriber 2.0.4.16),gzip(gfe)