Article View: sci.lang
Article #5161Re: Proof that 'Shakespeare' was Edward de Vere, Earl of Oxford
From: Franz Gnaedinger
Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2010 08:50
Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2010 08:50
94 lines
5222 bytes
5222 bytes
One more message, for Melanie Sands who bravely defends her beloved William Shakespeare Paris, in the play Romeo and Juliet, is introduced as valiant Paris offering the alliteration valiant William William Shakespeare, director of the Globe and main actor a flower; in faith, a real flower In sonnet 83, addressing the Muse, Edward de Vere speaks of both your poets placing the actor on the same level as the playwright, for both are making the play, in the sense of Greek poieo poiesis poietes. From "valiant Paris" read as valiant William we may infer that William Shakespeare was a congenial director and actor, easily adopting the plays and acting out all intentions. He also may have stood the ground and ensured the performances under the pressure mentioned in sonnet 66 And Art made tongue-tied by authority while other directors yielded to the pressure, consider Peter Quince in the play A Midsummer Night's Dream, the shape of the fruit evoked by his name suggesting puffed cheeks and a small brain. Quince's actor Bottom, in order not to freighten the ladies of the court among the audience, and risking that all the actors be hung, proposes to make his lion roar like a nightingale - taking all strentgth out of the play, that is. Happened also to de Vere's plays, but not when valiant William was around. Paris, the prince of Troy, was rather a coward, or, one may say, he understood how to keep out of trouble, which may be a further characterization of William Shakespeare - valiant by being gentle good gentle youth By heaven, I love thee better than myself The cooperation between the two congenial collaborators was far from being free of conflicts, however, the bard confesses his sin - whatever the reason was that obliged him to keep silent about his authorship in the plays -, and de Vere solved the conflict in the way of the mild, gentle and sly Ulysses in his poem Lucrece (as explained earlier). The final and fatal conflict of the play must be a metaphor on the rivalry between playwright and actor, won in the end by the former whose lines live on while the equally ingenious performing is forgotten when the actor passed away. Paris provokes Romeo, this one shows him, Paris dies, and Romeo exclaims Noble County Paris! the Earl of Oxford elevating William Shakespeare of humble origin into the rank of an earl or count I'll bury thee in a triumphant grave namely in his work - the bard honors the actor, telling us that valiant William, a real flower, a gentle youth, his equal as poet in the original sense of the Greek word, contributed as much to their common work as he did himself, so that a next edition of the plays may justly be called: The Complete Works of Edward de Vere and William Shakespeare ... While conceiving and writing a play, Edward de Vere may have had William on his mind, and thus the play wrote itself on its own, carried, and carried far, by the spirit of the young collaborator, so that also William Shakespeare is present in the written form of the plays, way beyond his playacting. And Juliet? She symbolizes the audience that also contributed to the plays, in the way explained earlier. She is first mentioned in a call What, Juliet! offering another pun Watch, Juliet! Watching a play is what an audience does - listen and watch.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<084439b0-b7bb-4de7-a099-20ead8a82f41@q23g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!q23g2000yqd.googlegroups.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<f756c0f3-dccb-4b35-aa17-e97bd516cb2a@o3g2000yqb.googlegroups.com> <66a2884f-2f2e-4eaf-8ab4-71b3048f5e6c@t23g2000yqt.googlegroups.com> <f057c04f-cd8f-48fc-a519-dd0ac6fb41b8@v20g2000yqv.googlegroups.com> <08Tin.150363$yV6.121541@newsfe27.ams2> <f21d72a1-c587-43cc-8768-82c3d34cc2b0@33g2000yqj.googlegroups.com> <3ad22590-944a-401c-930c-e5588a619dc3@q21g2000yqm.googlegroups.com> <61046262-061d-4980-8460-fdeb52d485fa@t41g2000yqt.googlegroups.com> <50883379-fc6e-4a35-b479-162f1feece1d@f8g2000yqn.googlegroups.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 275bb0c91e,e31868f142332de6 X-Google-Attributes: gid275bb0c91e,public,usenet X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!q23g2000yqd.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: Franz Gnaedinger <frgn@bluemail.ch> Newsgroups: sci.lang,humanities.lit.authors.shakespeare Subject: Re: Proof that 'Shakespeare' was Edward de Vere, Earl of Oxford Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2010 00:50:22 -0800 (PST) Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 96 Message-ID: <084439b0-b7bb-4de7-a099-20ead8a82f41@q23g2000yqd.googlegroups.com> References: <f756c0f3-dccb-4b35-aa17-e97bd516cb2a@o3g2000yqb.googlegroups.com> <66a2884f-2f2e-4eaf-8ab4-71b3048f5e6c@t23g2000yqt.googlegroups.com> <f057c04f-cd8f-48fc-a519-dd0ac6fb41b8@v20g2000yqv.googlegroups.com> <08Tin.150363$yV6.121541@newsfe27.ams2> <f21d72a1-c587-43cc-8768-82c3d34cc2b0@33g2000yqj.googlegroups.com> <3ad22590-944a-401c-930c-e5588a619dc3@q21g2000yqm.googlegroups.com> <61046262-061d-4980-8460-fdeb52d485fa@t41g2000yqt.googlegroups.com> <50883379-fc6e-4a35-b479-162f1feece1d@f8g2000yqn.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 129.132.202.35 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Trace: posting.google.com 1267692622 16392 127.0.0.1 (4 Mar 2010 08:50:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2010 08:50:22 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: q23g2000yqd.googlegroups.com; posting-host=129.132.202.35; posting-account=i6LhmwkAAAA3KqiGA282c1QpgBTwJ-V0 User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-Via: 1.1 proxy.ethz.ch (squid/3.0.STABLE20) X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; de; rv:1.8.1.19) Gecko/20081201 Firefox/2.0.0.19,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)