🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: sci.lang
Article #5181

Re: Proof that 'Shakespeare' was Edward de Vere, Earl of Oxford

#5181
From: johnk
Date: Fri, 05 Mar 2010 17:09
71 lines
4122 bytes
On Mar 5, 10:42 am, Franz Gnaedinger <f...@bluemail.ch> wrote:
> On Mar 5, 1:18 pm, "Peter T. Daniels" <gramma...@verizon.net> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Where did you find a recording of a 17th-century singer?
>
> I am speaking of modern singers and pop songs,
> where I hear love and rarely loue, very soft, in
> order to express real loue, a soft sweet feeling
> (although a singer has just the one thing in mind,
> to stand his pretty piece of flesh, as a character
> in Romeo and Juliet says). You are one of the
> enduring phonemishists of sci.lang, when
> phonemes have long proved being not reliable,
> the physiology of speaking - of moving lips and
> jaw and tongue - is the real thing for me.


But you still don't even know what a phoneme is.

>
> > You are extremely confused.
>
> My rendering of producing the 'v' and 'u' and 'w'
> in the light of physiology confuses you, Sir,
> I am bright and clear as always, methinks.


you thinks wrong.  You aren't even aware that people run circles
around you laughing at you because we know the terminology and you
don't.  You are not confusing Peter; he's exposing your ignorance and
you don't even realize it!


>
> > Phonemes don't have "physiological aspects."
>
> Bang bang Peter's silver hammer goes down on
> me head.


Yet you learned nothing from it, I assume.


>
> > Not in English, they're not.
>
> Look up the phonetical renderings of valiant


What is 'phonetical'?


> and William, you phonemishist, and you'll see
> that they are quite close.


So if it is 'phonetics' you are talking about (and it is), you should
not refer to phonemes.  Anyone who has taken beginning linguistics
knows this already.  Please read a linguistics textbook.


>
> Why don't you go back to the university of
> Big Onion, ask for someone to learn you how
> to read,

And why don't you learn something about linguistics before you
continue posting your gibberish?
Fool!
Technical Details
Message-ID: <42fbe886-188c-46c3-b387-491e87b63e2f@o30g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!o30g2000yqb.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
References: <f756c0f3-dccb-4b35-aa17-e97bd516cb2a@o3g2000yqb.googlegroups.com> <08Tin.150363$yV6.121541@newsfe27.ams2> <f21d72a1-c587-43cc-8768-82c3d34cc2b0@33g2000yqj.googlegroups.com> <3ad22590-944a-401c-930c-e5588a619dc3@q21g2000yqm.googlegroups.com> <61046262-061d-4980-8460-fdeb52d485fa@t41g2000yqt.googlegroups.com> <50883379-fc6e-4a35-b479-162f1feece1d@f8g2000yqn.googlegroups.com> <084439b0-b7bb-4de7-a099-20ead8a82f41@q23g2000yqd.googlegroups.com> <73bb380a-7e64-4137-8b18-1ba935c89b2a@b30g2000yqd.googlegroups.com> <b86e376a-8505-4198-9506-87f62e01ab2f@g7g2000yqe.googlegroups.com> <0226213f-07ba-47f0-827d-fcee6b09a51f@z11g2000yqz.googlegroups.com> <b55c041b-40d1-46cb-be0d-7623a3c1ad53@u9g2000yqb.googlegroups.com> <5fe7d51f-4d7d-4324-8edc-645d1b98a3ab@z4g2000yqa.googlegroups.com> <1c7030e5-9d3c-4268-a3bd-05af040cb9dd@o30g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 275bb0c91e,e31868f142332de6
X-Google-Attributes: gid275bb0c91e,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!o30g2000yqb.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: johnk <jhobartkyle@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: sci.lang,humanities.lit.authors.shakespeare
Subject: Re: Proof that 'Shakespeare' was Edward de Vere, Earl of Oxford
Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2010 09:09:16 -0800 (PST)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 72
Message-ID: <42fbe886-188c-46c3-b387-491e87b63e2f@o30g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>
References: <f756c0f3-dccb-4b35-aa17-e97bd516cb2a@o3g2000yqb.googlegroups.com> 
 <08Tin.150363$yV6.121541@newsfe27.ams2> <f21d72a1-c587-43cc-8768-82c3d34cc2b0@33g2000yqj.googlegroups.com>
 <3ad22590-944a-401c-930c-e5588a619dc3@q21g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>
 <61046262-061d-4980-8460-fdeb52d485fa@t41g2000yqt.googlegroups.com>
 <50883379-fc6e-4a35-b479-162f1feece1d@f8g2000yqn.googlegroups.com>
 <084439b0-b7bb-4de7-a099-20ead8a82f41@q23g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>
 <73bb380a-7e64-4137-8b18-1ba935c89b2a@b30g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>
 <b86e376a-8505-4198-9506-87f62e01ab2f@g7g2000yqe.googlegroups.com>
 <0226213f-07ba-47f0-827d-fcee6b09a51f@z11g2000yqz.googlegroups.com>
 <b55c041b-40d1-46cb-be0d-7623a3c1ad53@u9g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>
 <5fe7d51f-4d7d-4324-8edc-645d1b98a3ab@z4g2000yqa.googlegroups.com>
 <1c7030e5-9d3c-4268-a3bd-05af040cb9dd@o30g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 75.39.139.45
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1267808956 8714 127.0.0.1 (5 Mar 2010 17:09:16 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2010 17:09:16 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: o30g2000yqb.googlegroups.com; posting-host=75.39.139.45; 
 posting-account=PrMwUQoAAADGyMbIBX36mWaEj3Wxz88b
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8) 
 Gecko/20100202 Firefox/3.5.8 (.NET CLR 3.5.30729),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)