Article View: sci.lang
Article #5183Re: Proof that 'Shakespeare' was Edward de Vere, Earl of Oxford
From: Peter T. Daniels
Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2010 21:51
Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2010 21:51
67 lines
4893 bytes
4893 bytes
On Mar 1, 4:23 pm, Panu <craoibhi...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mar 1, 9:53 pm, Harlan Messinger > > > > > > <hmessinger.removet...@comcast.net> wrote: > > Panu wrote: > > > On Mar 1, 3:41 pm, "bobgrum...@nut-n-but.net" <bobgrum...@nut-n- > > > but.net> wrote: > > >>> Of course we have heard of Oscar Wilde (an Irishman), George Bernard > > >>> Shaw (another Irishman), Eugene O'Neill (an American), Tennessee > > >>> Williams (another American), and Arthur Miller (another American). > > >>> August Wilson is unknown to me, but Tom Stoppard sounds vaguely > > >>> familiar. > > >>> It is obvious that Americans excel in drama, > > >> Actually, America has not yet produced a first-rate (performed) > > >> playwright. WIlliams, O'Neill and Miller aren't even second-rate. > > > >>> because their culture has > > >>> been cross-pollinated by so many non-English cultures. American > > >>> theatrical tradition and film were obviously vitalized by immigrants > > >>> escaping from Nazi Germany and its dominions. > > >>> As regards good literature, there is obviously a lot of it in > > >>> civilized languages, such as German and Polish, to mention just two of > > >>> them.- Hide quoted text - > > >> I'm curious, Panu, as to (1) what authors of any kind in English you > > >> find to be first-rate, and (2) why Shakespeare is not. > > > > Well, I like John McGahern's novel "Amongst Women", for instance, and > > > William Butler Yeats has written some fine poetry. > > > > As regards Shakespeare's greatness, I think the burden of proof is on > > > those who profess to believe in it. > > > I'm sorry, I didn't realize that for everything I like in life, I have > > any obligation to prove to anyone else that I like it or that I have any > > basis for liking it. > > I am always happy to tell people why I like a particular writer. I > might even have a vivid memory of reading his works for the first > time. > > > > > > When asked why Shakespeare is so > > > great, their answers usually boil down to the fact that they were > > > taught so. > > > Really? Fascinating. I'm sure lots of people openly explain that they > > like this or that because someone taught them that they like it. As > > though people even think that way about the things that they like. > > In my opinion, the evidence for Shakespeare's greatness presented in > this thread boils down exactly to that. The fact that people > unwittingly quote Shakespeare all the time only shows that they were > brought up among the cultists.- Or that they were brought up speaking the English language. Incidentally, Shakespeare is a lot better on the stage than on the page.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<a85762fa-12b5-4f99-ac41-a02ccdc5bede@j27g2000yqn.googlegroups.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!j27g2000yqn.googlegroups.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<f756c0f3-dccb-4b35-aa17-e97bd516cb2a@o3g2000yqb.googlegroups.com> <Dtuin.137191$jI5.97288@newsfe08.ams2> <c757183d-0678-4f70-9d97-7777780c872b@q15g2000yqj.googlegroups.com> <2fffc65d-7043-4089-a54e-67a678761479@19g2000yqu.googlegroups.com> <98ee5284-187c-4477-9be5-c851cb5577c1@q15g2000yqj.googlegroups.com> <5tGdnSQrSZLXQRfWnZ2dnUVZ_uOdnZ2d@netspace.net.au> <a8215932-dcf9-43f0-8772-b5881c6bba3c@g11g2000yqe.googlegroups.com> <8aee5d96-7884-40d8-9028-6b54a29c8dae@t41g2000yqt.googlegroups.com> <75ebce09-0619-45a5-89c6-c0f1d38c4207@g28g2000yqh.googlegroups.com> <09d70b56-62be-415b-9586-b54764bcf425@u9g2000yqb.googlegroups.com> <2eaf92ae-d359-4073-ac8e-8ad64796e52e@q23g2000yqd.googlegroups.com> <7v2k9iFf4eU1@mid.individual.net> <c8839593-86a7-475c-9355-fcf6537e073c@e7g2000yqf.googlegroups.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 275bb0c91e,e31868f142332de6 X-Google-Attributes: gid275bb0c91e,public,usenet X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!j27g2000yqn.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: "Peter T. Daniels" <grammatim@verizon.net> Newsgroups: sci.lang,humanities.lit.authors.shakespeare Subject: Re: Proof that 'Shakespeare' was Edward de Vere, Earl of Oxford Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2010 13:51:41 -0800 (PST) Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 67 Message-ID: <a85762fa-12b5-4f99-ac41-a02ccdc5bede@j27g2000yqn.googlegroups.com> References: <f756c0f3-dccb-4b35-aa17-e97bd516cb2a@o3g2000yqb.googlegroups.com> <Dtuin.137191$jI5.97288@newsfe08.ams2> <c757183d-0678-4f70-9d97-7777780c872b@q15g2000yqj.googlegroups.com> <2fffc65d-7043-4089-a54e-67a678761479@19g2000yqu.googlegroups.com> <98ee5284-187c-4477-9be5-c851cb5577c1@q15g2000yqj.googlegroups.com> <5tGdnSQrSZLXQRfWnZ2dnUVZ_uOdnZ2d@netspace.net.au> <a8215932-dcf9-43f0-8772-b5881c6bba3c@g11g2000yqe.googlegroups.com> <8aee5d96-7884-40d8-9028-6b54a29c8dae@t41g2000yqt.googlegroups.com> <75ebce09-0619-45a5-89c6-c0f1d38c4207@g28g2000yqh.googlegroups.com> <09d70b56-62be-415b-9586-b54764bcf425@u9g2000yqb.googlegroups.com> <2eaf92ae-d359-4073-ac8e-8ad64796e52e@q23g2000yqd.googlegroups.com> <7v2k9iFf4eU1@mid.individual.net> <c8839593-86a7-475c-9355-fcf6537e073c@e7g2000yqf.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 72.79.103.81 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1267480301 31870 127.0.0.1 (1 Mar 2010 21:51:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2010 21:51:41 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: j27g2000yqn.googlegroups.com; posting-host=72.79.103.81; posting-account=tXYReAoAAABbl0njRzivyU02EBLaX9OF User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 6.0; Trident/4.0; SLCC1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; Media Center PC 5.0; InfoPath.2; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET CLR 3.0.30729; .NET CLR 1.1.4322),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)