🚀 go-pugleaf

On Feb 28, 3:07 am, Franz Gnaedinger <f...@bluemail.ch> wrote:
> Proof that 'Shakespeare' was Edward de Vere, Earl of Oxford

Ah, so? Then, who was Anne Hathaway and who lived in the structure
called Shakespeare's cottage?

> Romeo, in the play Romeo and Juliet, is mentioned
> for the first time in a question
>
>   O, where is Romeo?
>
> a question offering a pun
>
>   O, Vere is Romeo!
>
> a pun providing an answer
>
>   de Vere, Oxford
>
> Edward de Vere, Earl of Oxford who signed his early
> works EO as in Romeo romEO, the pronounced English
> initials E and O resembling Italian io meaning I, it's me.
> The bard mentioned that his name is bound by one letter,
> which is true for the name, the pun, and the answer
>
>   Edward de Vere     E...e     12 letters  (name)
>
>   O, Vere is Romeo     O...o     12 letters  (pun)
>
>   de Vere, Oxford     d...d     12 letters  (answer)
>
> whereby the binding letters of the name E and pun O
> yield the initials of the title
>
>   Earl of Oxford     12 letters  (title)
>
> Name, pun, answer and title contain 12 letters each,
> accordingly Juliet in the orchard is awaiting Romeo's
> message at twelve.
>
> On a veiled level of the play, Romeo would symbolize
> the playwright who was bound to hold back his name
> and conceal his authorship; Juliet would symbolize
> the adoring audience, rapt public, and loving Muse
> who make the poetical torch burn bright; and Paris,
> who claimed Juliet for his wife, beautiful Juliet, more
> beautiful than all other girls of Verona including lively
> Helena - Paris would symbolize William Shakespeare
> from Statford on Avon who might secretly have been
> given a modest but lifelong pension for pretending
> to be the author of those plays and poems, granted
> by de Vere's relationship, out of whatever sad reason,
> so that a personal tragedy would underly the tragic
> love story of the play and make it only the deeper:
>
>   For never was a story of more woe
>   Than this of Juliet and Romeo.
>
> The last lines end on oe and eo respectively, eo
> EO Earl of Oxford, so the bard signed his play,
> if ever so clandestinely, and although Juliet had
> argued most reasonably and beautifully:
>
>   What's a name! that which we call a rose
>   By any other name would smell as sweet;
>   So Romeo would, were he not Romeo call'd,
>   Retain that dear perfection which he owns
>   Without that title:--Romeo, doff thy name;
>   And for that name, which is no part of thee,
>   Take all myself.
>
> The bard's name doesn't count, important are
> his plays and poems, and the public loves them,
> is all for him to take.
>
> Franz Gnaedinger, Zuerich, February 28, 2010