Article View: sci.lang
Article #5239Re: Proof that 'Shakespeare' was Edward de Vere, Earl of Oxford
From: Peter T. Daniels
Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2010 15:00
Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2010 15:00
25 lines
2533 bytes
2533 bytes
On Feb 28, 9:55 am, Panu <craoibhi...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Feb 28, 3:47 pm, "Peter Farey" <pete...@rey.prestel.co.uk> wrote: > > > "Panu" wrote: > > > > Franz Gnaedinger wrote: > > > > > Proof that 'Shakespeare' was Edward de Vere, Earl of Oxford > > > > Who the hell is interested in Shakespeare anyway? > > > Rather more than those who are interested in Na'vi or Dnghe I suspect? > > I'm not talking about quantity, but quality. Besides, Shakespeare > would not interest anyone if he wasn't so heavily subsidized. What _are_ you talking about? (Both points.) > Well, I do admit that much that S. Labhrás Ó Súilleabháin's > translation of Macbeth, Traigéide Mhic Bheatha, is an important part > of modern Irish literature. It even restores the original Scots Gaelic > names of the protagonists and must thus be seen as better than the > original. What a bizarre criterion.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<2fffc65d-7043-4089-a54e-67a678761479@19g2000yqu.googlegroups.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!19g2000yqu.googlegroups.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<f756c0f3-dccb-4b35-aa17-e97bd516cb2a@o3g2000yqb.googlegroups.com> <c3ce9fc9-31f6-47f5-8b56-5a01507688e7@e7g2000yqf.googlegroups.com> <Dtuin.137191$jI5.97288@newsfe08.ams2> <c757183d-0678-4f70-9d97-7777780c872b@q15g2000yqj.googlegroups.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 275bb0c91e,e31868f142332de6 X-Google-Attributes: gid275bb0c91e,public,usenet X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!19g2000yqu.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: "Peter T. Daniels" <grammatim@verizon.net> Newsgroups: sci.lang,humanities.lit.authors.shakespeare Subject: Re: Proof that 'Shakespeare' was Edward de Vere, Earl of Oxford Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2010 07:00:34 -0800 (PST) Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 25 Message-ID: <2fffc65d-7043-4089-a54e-67a678761479@19g2000yqu.googlegroups.com> References: <f756c0f3-dccb-4b35-aa17-e97bd516cb2a@o3g2000yqb.googlegroups.com> <c3ce9fc9-31f6-47f5-8b56-5a01507688e7@e7g2000yqf.googlegroups.com> <Dtuin.137191$jI5.97288@newsfe08.ams2> <c757183d-0678-4f70-9d97-7777780c872b@q15g2000yqj.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 72.79.103.81 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1267369234 4332 127.0.0.1 (28 Feb 2010 15:00:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2010 15:00:34 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: 19g2000yqu.googlegroups.com; posting-host=72.79.103.81; posting-account=tXYReAoAAABbl0njRzivyU02EBLaX9OF User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 6.0; Trident/4.0; SLCC1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; Media Center PC 5.0; InfoPath.2; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET CLR 3.0.30729; .NET CLR 1.1.4322),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)