Article View: sci.lang
Article #5247Re: Proof that 'Shakespeare' was Edward de Vere, Earl of Oxford
From: Harlan Messinger
Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2010 22:10
Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2010 22:10
41 lines
3613 bytes
3613 bytes
Panu wrote: > On Feb 28, 9:01 pm, "Peter T. Daniels" <gramma...@verizon.net> wrote: >> On Feb 28, 12:00 pm, Panu <craoibhi...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >>> On Feb 28, 5:00 pm, "Peter T. Daniels" <gramma...@verizon.net> wrote: >>>> On Feb 28, 9:55 am, Panu <craoibhi...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> On Feb 28, 3:47 pm, "Peter Farey" <pete...@rey.prestel.co.uk> wrote: >>>>>> "Panu" wrote: >>>>>>> Franz Gnaedinger wrote: >>>>>>>> Proof that 'Shakespeare' was Edward de Vere, Earl of Oxford >>>>>>> Who the hell is interested in Shakespeare anyway? >>>>>> Rather more than those who are interested in Na'vi or Dnghe I suspect? >>>>> I'm not talking about quantity, but quality. Besides, Shakespeare >>>>> would not interest anyone if he wasn't so heavily subsidized. >>>> What _are_ you talking about? (Both points.) >>> You know perfectly well that Shakespeare is just a minor, obscure >>> dramatist from the dark dungeons of literary history writing in an >>> English which is only partly intelligible to the speakers of the >>> modern language. If he weren't force-fed to millions of poor >>> schoolchildren in that benighted part of the world inhabited by >>> monolingual speakers of English, he would already have been consigned, >>> if not to merciful oblivion, so at least to the limbo that is the fate >>> of all linguistically and culturally uninteresting writers meriting >>> only second-rate academic interest.- >> And of the crowds of Elizabethan playwrights, why is he the only one >> whose works are regularly produced, even though they received no >> special attention during his lifetime? > > You tell me. The Shakespeare cult has been around for so long that it > is self-sustaining by now. Everybody sees it as their duty to praise > the Emperor's new clothes. This is like the line, "The Odyssey wasn't written by Homer but by another man of that name." You're arguing that Shakespeare's work isn't beloved, and that the people who love his work are a "cult" and therefore something different. How many figures of speech in common use today come from the works of any of Shakespeare's contemporaries?
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<7v07ukFvrvU1@mid.individual.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mailReferences:
<f756c0f3-dccb-4b35-aa17-e97bd516cb2a@o3g2000yqb.googlegroups.com> <c3ce9fc9-31f6-47f5-8b56-5a01507688e7@e7g2000yqf.googlegroups.com> <Dtuin.137191$jI5.97288@newsfe08.ams2> <c757183d-0678-4f70-9d97-7777780c872b@q15g2000yqj.googlegroups.com> <2fffc65d-7043-4089-a54e-67a678761479@19g2000yqu.googlegroups.com> <98ee5284-187c-4477-9be5-c851cb5577c1@q15g2000yqj.googlegroups.com> <58e70baa-f7f0-4b40-94de-c5db88b3e6e1@q21g2000yqm.googlegroups.com> <c6620216-9e51-42e4-a40e-ca4a034d2c67@15g2000yqa.googlegroups.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 275bb0c91e,e31868f142332de6 X-Google-Attributes: gid275bb0c91e,public,usenet X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Harlan Messinger <hm.usenetremoverthis@gavelcade.com> Newsgroups: sci.lang,humanities.lit.authors.shakespeare Subject: Re: Proof that 'Shakespeare' was Edward de Vere, Earl of Oxford Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2010 17:10:11 -0500 Lines: 41 Message-ID: <7v07ukFvrvU1@mid.individual.net> References: <f756c0f3-dccb-4b35-aa17-e97bd516cb2a@o3g2000yqb.googlegroups.com> <c3ce9fc9-31f6-47f5-8b56-5a01507688e7@e7g2000yqf.googlegroups.com> <Dtuin.137191$jI5.97288@newsfe08.ams2> <c757183d-0678-4f70-9d97-7777780c872b@q15g2000yqj.googlegroups.com> <2fffc65d-7043-4089-a54e-67a678761479@19g2000yqu.googlegroups.com> <98ee5284-187c-4477-9be5-c851cb5577c1@q15g2000yqj.googlegroups.com> <58e70baa-f7f0-4b40-94de-c5db88b3e6e1@q21g2000yqm.googlegroups.com> <c6620216-9e51-42e4-a40e-ca4a034d2c67@15g2000yqa.googlegroups.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: individual.net 6JxSRavbJF0AYWE/AOIGZw2tuC8AL8w+NxqQ3D2nEDzvltKt8P Cancel-Lock: sha1:IQXaI3utreLIL864zDjK9Pvy3GQ= User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812) In-Reply-To: <c6620216-9e51-42e4-a40e-ca4a034d2c67@15g2000yqa.googlegroups.com>