Why don't we just talk binary language???

Thread View: sci.lang

9 messages

[T] Back to Threads [V] Tree View [G] Group Articles

9 total messages Started by Victor Smootbank Mon, 20 Aug 2007 19:53

#2466

Author: Victor Smootbank
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 19:53

8 lines
1332 bytes

That would make communication far easier.

So let's start talking binary:

110010001001

111001001001
101010101011

Re: Why don't we just talk binary language???

#2467

Author: usenet andor www.mantra.comjai D...
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 08:50

19 lines
1461 bytes

In article <1187639582.990983.309740@a39g2000hsc.googlegroups.com>, 
 Victor Smootbank <mean_priests@yahoo.com> posted: 
> 
> That would make communication far easier.
> 
> So let's start talking binary:
> 
> 110010001001
> 
> 111001001001
> 101010101011

Some people see the light, others start thinking like a light switch.

Jai Maharaj 
http://tinyurl.com/24fq83 
http://www.mantra.com/jai 
http://www.mantra.com/jyotish 
Om Shanti

Re: Why don't we just talk binary language???

#2468

Author: Mike M
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 10:08

25 lines
2196 bytes

On 21 Aug, 09:50, use...@mantra.com and/or www.mantra.com/jai (Dr. Jai
Maharaj) wrote:
> In article <1187639582.990983.309...@a39g2000hsc.googlegroups.com>,
>  Victor Smootbank <mean_prie...@yahoo.com> posted:
>
>
>
> > That would make communication far easier.
>
> > So let's start talking binary:
>
> > 110010001001
>
> > 111001001001
> > 101010101011
>
> Some people see the light, others start thinking like a light switch.
>
> Jai Maharajhttp://tinyurl.com/24fq83http://www.mantra.com/jaihttp://www.mantra.com/jyotish
> Om Shanti

There are only 10 types of people: those that understand binary, and
those that don't.

Mike M

Re: Why don't we just talk binary language???

#2469

Author: usenet andor www.mantra.comjai D...
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 10:51

39 lines
1973 bytes

In article <1187690939.785293.54230@g4g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>, 
Mike M <mikmooney@googlemail.com> posted: 
 
> www.mantra.com/jyotish (Dr. Jai Maharaj) wrote:

> > In article <1187639582.990983.309...@a39g2000hsc.googlegroups.com>,
> >  Victor Smootbank <mean_prie...@yahoo.com> posted:
> >
> >
> >
> > > That would make communication far easier.
> >
> > > So let's start talking binary:
> >
> > > 110010001001
> >
> > > 111001001001
> > > 101010101011

>> Some people see the light, others start thinking like a light switch.
>>
>> Jai Maharaj 
>> http://tinyurl.com/24fq83 
>> http://www.mantra.com/jai 
>> http://www.mantra.com/jyotish 
>> Om Shanti
 
> There are only 10 types of people: those that understand binary, 
> and those that don't.
> 
> Mike M

Not if "10" is ten.

Jai Maharaj 
http://tinyurl.com/24fq83 
http://www.mantra.com/jai 
http://www.mantra.com/jyotish 
Om Shanti

Re: Why don't we just talk binary language???

#2470

Author: Mike M
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 11:10

40 lines
2608 bytes

On 21 Aug, 11:51, use...@mantra.com and/or www.mantra.com/jai (Dr. Jai
Maharaj) wrote:
> In article <1187690939.785293.54...@g4g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>,
> Mike M <mikmoo...@googlemail.com> posted:
>
>
>
>
>
> >www.mantra.com/jyotish(Dr. Jai Maharaj) wrote:
> > > In article <1187639582.990983.309...@a39g2000hsc.googlegroups.com>,
> > >  Victor Smootbank <mean_prie...@yahoo.com> posted:
>
> > > > That would make communication far easier.
>
> > > > So let's start talking binary:
>
> > > > 110010001001
>
> > > > 111001001001
> > > > 101010101011
> >> Some people see the light, others start thinking like a light switch.
>
> >> Jai Maharaj
> >>http://tinyurl.com/24fq83
> >>http://www.mantra.com/jai
> >>http://www.mantra.com/jyotish
> >> Om Shanti
> > There are only 10 types of people: those that understand binary,
> > and those that don't.
>
> > Mike M
>
> Not if "10" is ten.
>


<Whoooosssshhhhhhh.....>

Mike M

Re: Why don't we just talk binary language???

#2471

Author: harmony
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 15:09

47 lines
2552 bytes

<usenet@mantra.com and/or www.mantra.com/jai (Dr. Jai Maharaj)> wrote in 
message news:20070821BY7jjTAXO16qI5Q3sgk1qE1@T8lHx...
> In article <1187690939.785293.54230@g4g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>,
> Mike M <mikmooney@googlemail.com> posted:
>
>> www.mantra.com/jyotish (Dr. Jai Maharaj) wrote:
>
>> > In article <1187639582.990983.309...@a39g2000hsc.googlegroups.com>,
>> >  Victor Smootbank <mean_prie...@yahoo.com> posted:
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > > That would make communication far easier.
>> >
>> > > So let's start talking binary:
>> >
>> > > 110010001001
>> >
>> > > 111001001001
>> > > 101010101011
>
>>> Some people see the light, others start thinking like a light switch.
>>>
>>> Jai Maharaj
>>> http://tinyurl.com/24fq83
>>> http://www.mantra.com/jai
>>> http://www.mantra.com/jyotish
>>> Om Shanti
>
>> There are only 10 types of people: those that understand binary,
>> and those that don't.
>>
>> Mike M
>
> Not if "10" is ten.
>

mike has not been taught in hindu numbering system.


> Jai Maharaj
> http://tinyurl.com/24fq83
> http://www.mantra.com/jai
> http://www.mantra.com/jyotish
> Om Shanti
>

Re: Why don't we just talk binary language???

#2472

Author: Don Phillipson
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 21:15

22 lines
1945 bytes

>  Victor Smootbank <mean_priests@yahoo.com> posted:
> >
> > That would make communication far easier.
> >
> > So let's start talking binary:
> >
> > 110010001001
> >
> > 111001001001
> > 101010101011

First, let us consider the difference between a
system of notation (e.g. Roman or Arabic
numerals, the Latin alphabet, the Hebrew or Greek
alphabets etc.) and a language.  Most of the
world's languages have no unique or native
system of notation.

-- 
Don Phillipson
Carlsbad Springs
(Ottawa, Canada)

Re: Why don't we just talk binary language???

#2473

Author: Paul J Kriha
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 06:01

43 lines
3492 bytes

"Mike M" <mikmooney@googlemail.com> wrote in message
news:1187694650.951696.253540@o80g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
> On 21 Aug, 11:51, use...@mantra.com and/or www.mantra.com/jai (Dr. Jai
> Maharaj) wrote:
> > In article <1187690939.785293.54...@g4g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>,
> > Mike M <mikmoo...@googlemail.com> posted:
> > >www.mantra.com/jyotish(Dr. Jai Maharaj) wrote:
> > > > In article <1187639582.990983.309...@a39g2000hsc.googlegroups.com>,
> > > >  Victor Smootbank <mean_prie...@yahoo.com> posted:
> >
> > > > > That would make communication far easier.
> >
> > > > > So let's start talking binary:
> >
> > > > > 110010001001
> >
> > > > > 111001001001
> > > > > 101010101011
> > >> Some people see the light, others start thinking like a light switch.
> >
> > >> Jai Maharaj
> > >>http://tinyurl.com/24fq83
> > >>http://www.mantra.com/jai
> > >>http://www.mantra.com/jyotish
> > >> Om Shanti
> > > There are only 10 types of people: those that understand binary,
> > > and those that don't.
> >
> > > Mike M
> >
> > Not if "10" is ten.
>
> <Whoooosssshhhhhhh.....>

Indeed.
If only he could think of a numerical system in which
one plus one equals ten. When he does, he will gain
admission into the Binary Nirvana through which he can
ascend (while sidestepping the evil brothers Trinary
and Ternary of the Nibble Family) straight into the
Eighth Heaven of Octal System.

pjk

Re: Why don't we just talk binary language???

#2474

Author: DKleinecke
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 21:40

18 lines
2297 bytes

On Aug 21, 11:01 pm, "Paul J Kriha"
<paul.nospam.kr...@paradise.net.nz> wrote:

> If only he could think of a numerical system in which
> one plus one equals ten. When he does, he will gain
> admission into the Binary Nirvana through which he can
> ascend (while sidestepping the evil brothers Trinary
> and Ternary of the Nibble Family) straight into the
> Eighth Heaven of Octal System.

Bad News Brother

Then Octal Dispensation is no more.

We are in the Hexadecimal dispensation now.

And we desperately need better symbols for eleven, twelve, thirteen,
fourteen and fifteen.

Thread Navigation

This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.

Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.

Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.

Back to All Threads