🚀 go-pugleaf

wendy c wrote:
> 
> In article <33E930D8.5DEA@is3.nyu.edu>
> Terence <tqn6803@is3.nyu.edu> wrote:
> 
> > Dave Wagner wrote:
> >>
> >> Finally, I'd like to remark on the implicit heterocentricity of the
> >> previous postings...
> >> for many people, the "someone" for them is not of the opposite sex.  If
> >> you take this
> >> into account you will have to apply "Tutte's One-factor Theorem"
> >> instead, for which
> >> I refer you to any introductory textbook on graph theory.
> >>
> > Every thing was going so smooth, why did you have to bring this up?  Why
> > must everything involve this?
> 
> because it is implicit in the original hypothesis.  the set of
> 'everyone' includes people of every sexual inclination,
> as well as celibate priests and nuns, polygamists, children,
> and homophobic internet geeks.
> 

Not true, it does not matter past the way the hypothesis was meant to be
shaped.  They do it in economics, he can do it here.  Besides the
original writer saying that he is not concerned with this group - there
are only two sexes, those that make ova, and are called women, and those
that produce sperm, those that are called men.

If we consider celibate people, which the original writer said he might
match up, it has to be taken into account that not all of them have
lived a life without sex.  So that matches them still. Polygamists
usually have someone, and also marry those that do not want them - at
least that used to be the case, so that means that the women (This group
is male dominated) want someone else. They have cheated on their
husbands.

Children do not matter based on our laws

Homophobic internet geeks?  I haven't met any of them. Maybe you are a
heterosexually challenged female that is scared that if the sperm met
the egg, and you had a kid, you wouldn't know what to do. What set you
off? A boyfriend treat you badly? Or if not you, a friend of yours?

I don't care what you do, but I will not read a lie being spread as the
truth, religiously, and this thread did not include them.  That has been
explained and proven as a fact.  What I can't speak anymore without
having to include them?  I think I can. That doesn't make anyone
homophobic, that means they want the friends that they want, or want to
talk as they want.

There is one thing that most people are taught as children, you can't
please all of the people all of the time. I don't have to be called a
name solely on your feeling that you have a right to include yourself
where you are not involved. Accept that those that like you, like you,
and those that do not want anything to do with you, don't want anything
to do with you. Hetero's have to accept that everyday they try to meet
someone. People subject to racial problems have to face it too. And we
sure have to live with it.
> wendy c
> 
> I'm an ad man, not a red herring!
> -- Cary Grant in 'North by Northwest'


Terence