🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: sci.logic
Article #112

Re: Set theory and modal logic

#112
From: Michael Carroll
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 1992 23:46
12 lines
911 bytes
In article <1992Apr10.013706.28964@morrow.stanford.edu>,
BR.MJC@forsythe.stanford.edu (Michael Carroll) writes:
> . . . . . And, in general, the interior and closure of x will be distinct
>from each other and from x itself.

Oops. This has not been shown. And the point of Loader's original
comment, which someone was kind enough to explicate for me, is
precisely that merely adding logical axioms for modal operators is
not enough to guarantee this.
--
Michael Carroll
Research Libraries Group
Technical Details
Message-ID: <1992Apr10.234644.23110@morrow.stanford.edu>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!stanford.edu!morrow.stanford.edu!news

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: sci.logic
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!stanford.edu!morrow.stanford.edu!news
From: BR.MJC@forsythe.stanford.edu (Michael Carroll)
Subject: Re: Set theory and modal logic
Message-ID: <1992Apr10.234644.23110@morrow.stanford.edu>
Sender: news@morrow.stanford.edu (News Service)
Organization: Stanford University, California, USA
Distribution: usa
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 1992 23:46:44 GMT
Lines: 12