🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <1992Sep8.204819.316@guinness.idbsu.edu>, holmes@opal.idbsu.edu (Randall Holmes) writes:
|> 
|> 
|> Please note that the existence of the set of all natural numbers is
                                         ^^^
|> sanctioned by one of the Fathers of the Church.  Note the use of

This is not obvious.  I am suspicious of the translation, you clever
promulgator of Platonism.

|> Every number is defined by its own unique character, so that no number
|> is equal to any other.  They are all unequal to one another and
|> different, and the individual numbers are finite, but as a class they
                                                              ^^^^^
Class?  Do you have the Latin here?

|> Never let us doubt, then, that every number is known to him 'whose
|> understanding cannot be numbered'.  Although the infinite series of

Of course, this doesn't require there to be a set of same.
-- 
Gary H. Merrill  [Principal Systems Developer, C Compiler Development]
SAS Institute Inc. / SAS Campus Dr. / Cary, NC  27513 / (919) 677-8000
sasghm@theseus.unx.sas.com ... !mcnc!sas!sasghm