Re: new enigma (#2)

Article View: sci.logic

Article #171

#171

From: David Ternes
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 1992 22:16

13 lines
1185 bytes

In article <GUTTMAN.92Sep9124309@circe.circe> guttman@circe.circe (Joshua D. Guttman) writes:
>Because he didn't have a belly button, of course.  
>
I don't think that's good enough.

A pair of (or does that imply four individuals?) Siamese twins were 
successfully seperated two weeks ago at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, MN. 
The big debate was which one would get the belly button.  I think they 
decided on the baby that was slightly smaller (probably so she could taunt
her bigger sibling).

E. David Ternes                                       dternes@udev.cdc.com
          Goal: To live either in obscurity or in competance.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <47564@shamash.cdc.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!dtix!darwin.sura.net!spool.mu.edu!umn.edu!noc.msc.net!uc.msc.edu!shamash!duke!dternes

References: <BuBH0w.GtH@ireq.hydro.qc.ca> <GUTTMAN.92Sep9124309@circe.circe>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!dtix!darwin.sura.net!spool.mu.edu!umn.edu!noc.msc.net!uc.msc.edu!shamash!duke!dternes
From: dternes@duke.cdc.com (David Ternes)
Newsgroups: sci.logic,rec.games.trivia
Subject: Re: new enigma (#2)
Message-ID: <47564@shamash.cdc.com>
Date: 14 Sep 92 22:16:55 GMT
References: <BuBH0w.GtH@ireq.hydro.qc.ca> <GUTTMAN.92Sep9124309@circe.circe>
Sender: usenet@shamash.cdc.com
Reply-To: dternes@mips.COM (David Ternes)
Followup-To: sci.logic
Distribution: na
Organization: Advanced Product Development
Lines: 13

Reply to Parent Message