Article View: sci.logic
Article #285Re: Russell's Paradox
From: Torkel Franzen
Date: Thu, 05 Nov 1992 09:45
Date: Thu, 05 Nov 1992 09:45
15 lines
1414 bytes
1414 bytes
In article <1992Nov04.233228.16942@Cookie.secapl.com> frank@Cookie.secapl.com (Frank Adams) writes: >Proper classes arose because it is hard to talk about sets in general >without them. I think it is safe to say that most mathematicians are a bit >uncomfortable dealing with proper classes, but their use is at least >demonstrably consistent (at least if the underlying set theory is >consistent). Adding to a set theory T predicative class existence axioms (i.e. axioms asserting the existence of classes definable by a formula containing no quantifiers over classes) yields a conservative extension of T, and the classes in such a case can be regarded as just a convenient way of referring to formulas. Adding impredicative class existence axioms yields an essentially stronger theory.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<TORKEL.92Nov5104554@isis.sics.se>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!yale.edu!ira.uka.de!math.fu-berlin.de!mailgzrz.TU-Berlin.DE!news.netmbx.de!Germany.EU.net!mcsun!sunic!sics.se!torkelReferences:
<24780@optima.cs.arizona.edu> <1992Nov04.233228.16942@Cookie.secapl.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: sci.logic Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!yale.edu!ira.uka.de!math.fu-berlin.de!mailgzrz.TU-Berlin.DE!news.netmbx.de!Germany.EU.net!mcsun!sunic!sics.se!torkel From: torkel@sics.se (Torkel Franzen) Subject: Re: Russell's Paradox In-Reply-To: frank@Cookie.secapl.com's message of Wed, 04 Nov 1992 23:32:28 GMT Message-ID: <TORKEL.92Nov5104554@isis.sics.se> Sender: news@sics.se Organization: Swedish Institute of Computer Science, Kista References: <24780@optima.cs.arizona.edu> <1992Nov04.233228.16942@Cookie.secapl.com> Date: Thu, 5 Nov 1992 09:45:54 GMT Lines: 15