Re: Why invalid? (was: Why logic?)

Article View: sci.logic

Article #510

#510

From: Russell Turpin
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1992 19:41

10 lines
829 bytes

-*----
In article <1992Nov16.091653.1@woods.ulowell.edu> cotera@woods.ulowell.edu writes:
> Can anyone explain why we use logic? Unfortunately, any logical 
> arguments to support logic, are unfortunately, invalid.

Unfortunately, I have no notion of what Ray Cote means by
"invalid."  Perhaps he could explain this.  (Those who notice
that such explanation is meta-logical discussion get an A.)

Russell

Technical Details

Message-ID: <lgfubaINN7v@peaches.cs.utexas.edu>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!caen!sdd.hp.com!cs.utexas.edu!news

References: <1992Nov16.091653.1@woods.ulowell.edu>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!caen!sdd.hp.com!cs.utexas.edu!news
From: turpin@cs.utexas.edu (Russell Turpin)
Newsgroups: sci.logic
Subject: Re: Why invalid?  (was:  Why logic?)
Date: 16 Nov 1992 13:41:30 -0600
Organization: CS Dept, University of Texas at Austin
Lines: 11
Message-ID: <lgfubaINN7v@peaches.cs.utexas.edu>
References: <1992Nov16.091653.1@woods.ulowell.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: peaches.cs.utexas.edu

Reply to Parent Message