🚀 go-pugleaf

On 06/11/2013 01:57 PM, Graham Cooper wrote:
> On Jun 12, 2:10 am, BruceS <bruce...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> On 06/10/2013 06:50 PM, Graham Cooper wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Jun 11, 9:55 am, BruceS <bruce...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On 06/10/2013 04:01 PM, Graham Cooper wrote:
>>
>>>>> On Jun 11, 12:30 am, Peter Percival  wrote:
>>>>>> I think I am an Elephant,
>>>>>> Behind another Elephant
>>>>>> Behind /another/ Elephant who isn't really there....
>>>>>>                                    A.A. Milne
>>
>>>>>         http://phpprolog.com/nat-s-s-dog.png
>>
>>>> OK, but have you paid Brad that $1000 you owe him?  Given your abject
>>>> poverty, you could just start paying him $1 per week, to at least show
>>>> good faith.  If you could afford it, maybe you could even make it $2 on
>>>> a good week.
>>
>>> Didn't you follow misc.legal?
>>
>>> Brad posted his 1st Question at the exact same minute that
>>> I posted Qualifying comments about the bet that it must be
>>> paypaled $1000 up front by him!
>>
>>> https://groups.google.com/group/aus.tv/msg/b0c7ab3af05af298
>>> BRAD
>>> More options Dec 31 2012, 3:41 pm
>>> Word One
>>> page 106 line 27
>>
>>> *************
>>> https://groups.google.com/group/sci.skeptic/msg/3c647092c1abbc41
>>> HERC
>>> More options Dec 31 2012, 3:41 pm
>>> What?
>>> You can paypal up front if you want
>>> Herc
>>
>>> Maybe if you 2 were a minute quicker or you didn't give away clues
>>> during a mindreading test we could have completed it!
>>
>> You're changing the story *again*?  Surely you jest.  You offered a bet
>> on another of your tests, claiming it was set such that you couldn't
>> back out once it began.  Brad accepted that bet.  You then tried some
>> sort of side bet, which he rejected.  You acted as if that meant he'd
>> backed out of the test and original bet, at which point he made it clear
>> that he hadn't, and had in fact started the test.  You then proceeded
>> with the test, demonstrating that you understood the bet was still in
>> force.  Partway through the test, you read a thread that clearly
>> indicated you shouldn't read it (because of your repeated whinges about
>> your magic powers getting "distracted"), and as a result you threw a
>> tantrum and quit.  You owe Brad $1000.  You know it, I know it, everyone
>> who cares to read the relevant threads knows it.  Nobody *really*
>> trusted you before, but now, instead of a suspicion that you wouldn't
>> follow through on your promises, we have proof that you're a liar and a
>> fraud.  You have no honor.  Nobody trusts you.
>
> Here are the relevant threads.
>
>
>
>> https://groups.google.com/group/aus.tv/msg/b0c7ab3af05af298
>> BRAD
>> More options Dec 31 2012, 3:41 pm
>> Word One
>> page 106 line 27
>> *************
>> https://groups.google.com/group/sci.skeptic/msg/3c647092c1abbc41
>> HERC
>> More options Dec 31 2012, 3:41 pm
>> What?
>> You can paypal up front if you want
>> Herc

Oh yeah, just keep spinning and spinning.  You're not fooling anyone, 
you know.

> Having honour in your eyes is like having a fat bum at a gay bar.

I realize that you have some strange fantasies, but I don't even know 
what you mean by this one.  You should keep your sexual habits to 
yourself.  In fact, I wonder if you're an Aries.  This week's horoscope 
for Aries (from America's Finest News Source, the best source for 
horoscopes) seems particularly apt:
"Sometimes in life, you just need to stop whatever it is you're doing 
and take a step back. Actually, maybe it's two steps back. Yeah, that's 
good. Keep going. The stars will let you know when you're far enough."