🚀 go-pugleaf

On 06/11/2013 03:47 PM, Graham Cooper wrote:
> On Jun 12, 7:38 am, BruceS <bruce...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> On 06/11/2013 01:57 PM, Graham Cooper wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Jun 12, 2:10 am, BruceS <bruce...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On 06/10/2013 06:50 PM, Graham Cooper wrote:
>>
>>>>> On Jun 11, 9:55 am, BruceS <bruce...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On 06/10/2013 04:01 PM, Graham Cooper wrote:
>>
>>>>>>> On Jun 11, 12:30 am, Peter Percival  wrote:
>>>>>>>> I think I am an Elephant,
>>>>>>>> Behind another Elephant
>>>>>>>> Behind /another/ Elephant who isn't really there....
>>>>>>>>                                     A.A. Milne
>>
>>>>>>>         http://phpprolog.com/nat-s-s-dog.png
>>
>>>>>> OK, but have you paid Brad that $1000 you owe him?  Given your abject
>>>>>> poverty, you could just start paying him $1 per week, to at least show
>>>>>> good faith.  If you could afford it, maybe you could even make it $2 on
>>>>>> a good week.
>>
>>>>> Didn't you follow misc.legal?
>>
>>>>> Brad posted his 1st Question at the exact same minute that
>>>>> I posted Qualifying comments about the bet that it must be
>>>>> paypaled $1000 up front by him!
>>
>>>>> https://groups.google.com/group/aus.tv/msg/b0c7ab3af05af298
>>>>> BRAD
>>>>> More options Dec 31 2012, 3:41 pm
>>>>> Word One
>>>>> page 106 line 27
>>
>>>>> *************
>>>>> https://groups.google.com/group/sci.skeptic/msg/3c647092c1abbc41
>>>>> HERC
>>>>> More options Dec 31 2012, 3:41 pm
>>>>> What?
>>>>> You can paypal up front if you want
>>>>> Herc
>>
>>>>> Maybe if you 2 were a minute quicker or you didn't give away clues
>>>>> during a mindreading test we could have completed it!
>>
>>>> You're changing the story *again*?  Surely you jest.  You offered a bet
>>>> on another of your tests, claiming it was set such that you couldn't
>>>> back out once it began.  Brad accepted that bet.  You then tried some
>>>> sort of side bet, which he rejected.  You acted as if that meant he'd
>>>> backed out of the test and original bet, at which point he made it clear
>>>> that he hadn't, and had in fact started the test.  You then proceeded
>>>> with the test, demonstrating that you understood the bet was still in
>>>> force.  Partway through the test, you read a thread that clearly
>>>> indicated you shouldn't read it (because of your repeated whinges about
>>>> your magic powers getting "distracted"), and as a result you threw a
>>>> tantrum and quit.  You owe Brad $1000.  You know it, I know it, everyone
>>>> who cares to read the relevant threads knows it.  Nobody *really*
>>>> trusted you before, but now, instead of a suspicion that you wouldn't
>>>> follow through on your promises, we have proof that you're a liar and a
>>>> fraud.  You have no honor.  Nobody trusts you.
>>
>>> Here are the relevant threads.
>>
>>>> https://groups.google.com/group/aus.tv/msg/b0c7ab3af05af298
>>>> BRAD
>>>> More options Dec 31 2012, 3:41 pm
>>>> Word One
>>>> page 106 line 27
>>>> *************
>>>> https://groups.google.com/group/sci.skeptic/msg/3c647092c1abbc41
>>>> HERC
>>>> More options Dec 31 2012, 3:41 pm
>>>> What?
>>>> You can paypal up front if you want
>>>> Herc
>>
>> Oh yeah, just keep spinning and spinning.  You're not fooling anyone,
>> you know.
>>
>>> Having honour in your eyes is like having a fat bum at a gay bar.
>>
>> I realize that you have some strange fantasies, but I don't even know
>> what you mean by this one.  You should keep your sexual habits to
>> yourself.  In fact, I wonder if you're an Aries.  This week's horoscope
>> for Aries (from America's Finest News Source, the best source for
>> horoscopes) seems particularly apt:
>> "Sometimes in life, you just need to stop whatever it is you're doing
>> and take a step back. Actually, maybe it's two steps back. Yeah, that's
>> good. Keep going. The stars will let you know when you're far enough."
>>
>
> The number 1 symptom of denial is citation blindness.

So, does that mean you're not going to take the stars' advice?


> https://groups.google.com/group/aus.tv/msg/b0c7ab3af05af298
>
>>>> BRAD
>>>> More options Dec 31 2012, 3:41 pm
>>>> Word One
>>>> page 106 line 27
>>>> *************
>
> https://groups.google.com/group/sci.skeptic/msg/3c647092c1abbc41
>
>>>> HERC
>>>> More options Dec 31 2012, 3:41 pm
>>>> What?
>>>> You can paypal up front if you want
>>>> Herc

Does it make you feel better to keep quoting brief bits of these threads?

> This is my Sky Pixie!
>
> http://www.chatzombie.com/Dragon.jpg
>
>
> If you think he's just imagined get your own!

I still haven't seen where you demonstrate where the "dragon" is.  Why 
don't you post another version, with the "dragon" outlined?  You did 
that with some of your other cloud pictures.  Without such an outline, 
most other people have no idea what you're on about.