🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: sci.logic
Article #810

Re: A Guide for Cantor Cranks

#810
From: Graham Cooper
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 11:39
70 lines
4419 bytes
On Mar 22, 9:04 pm, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mar 22, 12:44 am, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Mar 22, 12:38 am, Graham Cooper <grahamcoop...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Mar 22, 12:28 pm, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > Do you really thing that there is a binary sequence
> > > > > > from which you cannot get another binary sequence
> > > > > > by changing every 0 to 1 and every 1 to 0?
>
> > > > > Define GET.
>
> > > > Given a binary sequence b does there exist a binary
> > > > sequence b' such that wherever b has a 0, b' has a 1
> > > > and wherever b has a 1 b' has a 0?
>
> > > Define exists where
> > > exists n1, n2, ...
> > > is defined
>
> > Please stop the transparent evasions and answer the question.
>
> >                     - William Hughes
>
> If you feel you have to put restrictions on "get" or "exists"
> do so, but please attempt to be clear.


I don't need to put a restriction on an infinite sequence of Exists
d1, Exists d2...

as I previously suggested.

I am rechallenging your first declaration of 'making' a sequence from
the identify diagonal.

It's independent of the set of reals, so although it is defined, it
is not specified.

i.e. you haven't specified any particular real or any exclusion of
particular reals.

If you have a point then get on with it, I have made my argument
crystal clear in 20 different flavours, it fairly evident that I can
generate ANY sequence of binary digits at all from the generalised
diagonal.

If you answer each question in my post instead of snipping it will
save me backtracking 10 posts every time.

Do you agree with the following.

A SET HAS NO INTRINSIC ORDER
A SET MAY BE COUNTABLE
THE 'PERMUTATION OF A SET' WHEN LISTED FOR INSPECTION/OUTPUT IS
IRRELEVANT
THE DIAGONAL DEPENDS ON THE PERMUTATION
THE DIAGONAL IS IRRELEVANT

No more responses where you go

"NOPE!  TELL ME THE ROW WHERE THE ANTI-DIAGONAL IS!"

That's a waste of time.  Address my questions specifically or I'm
through!
Technical Details
Message-ID: <7726ca8d-3258-4702-9425-c9eed9751e84@o15g2000prn.googlegroups.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!o15g2000prn.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
References: <40e69d0c-eb77-4308-996e-c7dfc1a0ec1e@j13g2000pro.googlegroups.com> <f129e0bc-51d6-4ca2-a4b0-2880d77f7430@x8g2000prh.googlegroups.com> <b8aa5784-cf67-45f7-a2a3-8fb846dd5e13@i35g2000prd.googlegroups.com> <0b1f820e-6e15-4169-b69a-63a7cd7254ab@i4g2000pro.googlegroups.com> <4f02cf44-2d47-4c18-8a39-4d7f7b07497e@n2g2000prj.googlegroups.com> <725d4daa-6b98-4286-83e6-1619fa2a8b3c@k15g2000prk.googlegroups.com> <6f430fa7-a29a-4bca-a208-782931687ea3@o15g2000prn.googlegroups.com> <1eb5066d-c62d-4485-ac45-257820a550f3@f31g2000pri.googlegroups.com> <f0e2f811-c4cc-46ea-a572-8971d6501557@q12g2000prb.googlegroups.com> <ea46382d-4ac7-4d5b-8d93-e6927e6d0f99@y31g2000prd.googlegroups.com> <7d043f73-a1fa-401e-9d9a-ab27353e3582@d28g2000yqf.googlegroups.com> <3ea67e8d-976a-4829-b02e-b088af1e600e@z3g2000prz.googlegroups.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: f8362,bdbafb069b8118a7
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Thread: 10b271,bdbafb069b8118a7
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Thread: fd648,af7892021029fe4a
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gided4ff1f581,gid54ac8f410d,giddb42311052,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!o15g2000prn.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Graham Cooper <grahamcooper7@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: sci.logic,sci.math,comp.theory,sci.physics,aus.science
Subject: Re: A Guide for Cantor Cranks
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 04:39:44 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 70
Message-ID: <7726ca8d-3258-4702-9425-c9eed9751e84@o15g2000prn.googlegroups.com>
References: <40e69d0c-eb77-4308-996e-c7dfc1a0ec1e@j13g2000pro.googlegroups.com>
 <f129e0bc-51d6-4ca2-a4b0-2880d77f7430@x8g2000prh.googlegroups.com>
 <b8aa5784-cf67-45f7-a2a3-8fb846dd5e13@i35g2000prd.googlegroups.com>
 <0b1f820e-6e15-4169-b69a-63a7cd7254ab@i4g2000pro.googlegroups.com>
 <4f02cf44-2d47-4c18-8a39-4d7f7b07497e@n2g2000prj.googlegroups.com>
 <725d4daa-6b98-4286-83e6-1619fa2a8b3c@k15g2000prk.googlegroups.com>
 <6f430fa7-a29a-4bca-a208-782931687ea3@o15g2000prn.googlegroups.com>
 <1eb5066d-c62d-4485-ac45-257820a550f3@f31g2000pri.googlegroups.com>
 <f0e2f811-c4cc-46ea-a572-8971d6501557@q12g2000prb.googlegroups.com>
 <ea46382d-4ac7-4d5b-8d93-e6927e6d0f99@y31g2000prd.googlegroups.com>
 <7d043f73-a1fa-401e-9d9a-ab27353e3582@d28g2000yqf.googlegroups.com> <3ea67e8d-976a-4829-b02e-b088af1e600e@z3g2000prz.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 120.17.142.8
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1300793984 26896 127.0.0.1 (22 Mar 2011 11:39:44 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 11:39:44 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: o15g2000prn.googlegroups.com; posting-host=120.17.142.8; posting-account=EsDGawkAAAAN6xcF2fi-X0yb3ECD-3_I
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 6.1;
 Trident/4.0; SLCC2; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET CLR
 3.0.30729; HPMTDF; BRI/2),gzip(gfe)