🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <1a0f266f-05da-4856-b55b-
4e39a38ae21c@oz6g2000pbc.googlegroups.com>, grahamcooper7@gmail.com 
says...
> 
> On Aug 19, 1:27�pm, BDK <Cont...@Worldcontrol.com> wrote:
> > In article <856d4a8b-2500-4663-a86d-
> > 794040272...@kn3g2000pbc.googlegroups.com>, grahamcoop...@gmail.com
> > says...
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > On Aug 19, 9:44�am, Odysseus <odysseus1479...@yahoo-dot.ca> wrote:
> > > > In article <20120817083546.7a34a26669980ba581d77...@fidemturbare.com>,
> > > > �"Fidem Turbare, the non-existent atheist goddess"
> >
> > > > �<godd...@fidemturbare.com> wrote:
> > > > > On Fri, 17 Aug 2012 14:57:50 +0300
> > > > > Krevo <aki.karppi...@tut.fi> wrote:
> >
> > > > <snip>
> >
> > > > > > Hexadesimal wants that [16D] = [10H], but that was 14-basenumbering,
> > > > > > and that's gor you got 14 gold-medals, in Olympic-Games?
> >
> > > > > No, Hexadecimal is base 16, not 14. �The number 16D is not equal to
> > > > > 10H, for 16D equates to 365 in decimal, and 10H isn't a valid number in
> > > > > base 16 because the only available digits are "0123456789ABCDEF" (and if
> > > > > one ignores the "H" then 10 equates to 16 in decimal).
> >
> > > > It appears that the "D" and "H" in Krevo's post were not intended to be
> > > > digits, rather indicating the base in which the associated numerals are
> > > > written; I understood the first statement to say that "16" in decimal
> > > > refers to the same number as "10" in hexademical -- which is indeed true.
> >
> > > > --
> > > > Odysseus
> >
> > > The correct answer was: �"on 8th of the 8th 2012".
> >
> > > when I took this photo of the 12 pointed star
> >
> > >http://pro1og.com/LowMoon-Sun-12Stars.jpg
> >
> > > However, when trying to work out the nature of the 12 points, I
> > > incorrectly visualised the wrong polygon equation (2 concentric
> > > squares + 1 concentric square and diagonal square) instead of the
> > > actual 2 concentric diagonal squares which only makes �8+4=12.
> >
> > > --------+---------
> > > ------+ + +-------
> > > -----+ +-+ +------
> > > ----+ +---+ +-----
> > > ---+ +-----+ +----
> > > ----+ +---+ +-----
> > > -----+ +-+ +------
> > > ------+ + +-------
> > > --------+---------
> >
> > > � � � �[+]
> >
> > > ------------------
> > > -----********-----
> > > -----*------*-----
> > > -----*------*-----
> > > -----*------*-----
> > > -----*------*-----
> > > -----*------*-----
> > > -----*------*-----
> > > -----********-----
> > > ------------------
> >
> > > � � � �[=]
> >
> > > --------+---------
> > > ----**+ + +**-----
> > > ----*+ +-+ +*-----
> > > ----+ +---+ +-----
> > > ---+ +-----+ +----
> > > ----+ +---+ +-----
> > > ----*+ +-+ +*-----
> > > ----**+ + +**-----
> > > --------+---------
> >
> > > the morning after Musatov posted this about a 12 star sign in the sky.
> >
> > > 7/AUG/12
> >
> > > Martin Musatov.
> > > Woman of the Apocalypse
> > > 12:1 A great sign appeared in the sky, a woman clothed with the sun,
> > > with the moon under her feet, and on her head a crown of twelve
> > > stars.
> > > 2 She was with ...
> >
> > > (yes a nice babe (angel) works in the supermarket there..)
> >
> > > But since you're all tuned into Pen and Teller Bullsh%t it's of little
> > > consequence.
> >
> > > Herc
> >
> > What in the hell are you jabbering about?
> 
> 2 8 vertex figures superimposed = a 12 vertex figure.
> 
> as seen in the photo I took on 8 August.
> 
> You guys bumped the thread!
> 
> 
> Herc

Take your pills, you f'ing loon.

-- 
BDK- Head FUD-Master Blaster. Friend to all kOOkbashers.