Article View: sci.logic
Article #964Re: Why can no one in sci.math understand my simple point?
From: Owen Jacobson
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2010 02:30
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2010 02:30
17 lines
2136 bytes
2136 bytes
On 2010-06-27 08:24:15 -0400, Peter Webb said: > AFAIK, "listable" is not a formally defined mathematical term. This could be because every time someone presents you with a clear, concise definition you don't happen to like, you stop replying to them[0]. The definitions you've been presented with numerous times *just in this thread* are all variations on "a list of elements of some set S is a surjective function L from N (the natural numbers) to S." You're free to involve recursive enumerability in your definition if you like, but be prepared for misunderstandings. -o [0] See for example <2010062122134453246-angrybaldguy@gmailcom>.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<2010062722302771524-angrybaldguy@gmailcom>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!npeer02.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!post01.iad.highwinds-media.com!newsfe21.iad.POSTED!7564ea0f!not-for-mailReferences:
<87ocucFrn3U1@mid.individual.net> <4c171abb$0$25779$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au> <d97b009b-8086-4faa-9248-99fadd0b1949@i28g2000yqa.googlegroups.com> <b3413a4e-567b-4dfb-8037-21f14b826ede@g1g2000prg.googlegroups.com> <Virgil-71EA75.23485925062010@bignews.usenetmonster.com> <4c259cd4$0$1029$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au> <Virgil-4CE082.01003126062010@bignews.usenetmonster.com> <4c274337$0$12922$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 10cc56,3ac93f74e78deac9 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Thread: 10a774,3ac93f74e78deac9 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Thread: 109d8a,3ac93f74e78deac9 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gide4b186767d,gid3ac807a62f,gid9ef9b79ae9,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!npeer02.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!post01.iad.highwinds-media.com!newsfe21.iad.POSTED!7564ea0f!not-for-mail From: Owen Jacobson <angrybaldguy@gmail.com> Newsgroups: sci.logic,aus.tv,sci.math Message-ID: <2010062722302771524-angrybaldguy@gmailcom> References: <87ocucFrn3U1@mid.individual.net> <4c171abb$0$25779$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au> <d97b009b-8086-4faa-9248-99fadd0b1949@i28g2000yqa.googlegroups.com> <b3413a4e-567b-4dfb-8037-21f14b826ede@g1g2000prg.googlegroups.com> <Virgil-71EA75.23485925062010@bignews.usenetmonster.com> <4c259cd4$0$1029$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au> <Virgil-4CE082.01003126062010@bignews.usenetmonster.com> <4c274337$0$12922$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: Why can no one in sci.math understand my simple point? User-Agent: Unison/2.0.5 Lines: 18 X-Complaints-To: abuse@UsenetServer.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2010 02:30:27 UTC Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2010 22:30:27 -0400