Article View: sci.logic
Article #984Re: Legal 'training' for negative-knowledge ?
From: Scott Hedrick
Date: Sun, 23 May 2004 20:48
Date: Sun, 23 May 2004 20:48
19 lines
2467 bytes
2467 bytes
"McGyver" <Greyprof@msn.com> wrote in message news:2h90mfFabn1gU1@uni-berlin.de... > What you were saying in your case was, in effect: "This > default judgment should be set aside because I owed $10, not the > $11 stated in the complaint, therefore the complaint was invalid, > therefore the default judgment was invalid." You talk too much. The *fact* is, since pinhead didn't bother to follow the long established rules, it's irrelevant what he *owed*. *Now*, he *does* owe $11+. He would have saved money had he followed proper, long-established and easily available legal procedure by answering the initial complaint and showing up for trial. Because dumbass chose to ignore the existing rules and failed at imposing his own, he lost. His math is *now* all wrong, and he does in fact *now* owe what the other party claimed, plus costs and interest. Instead of continuing to show what a dipshit he is by posting here, the original poster should get a job and pay what he now owes. Had he paid the undisputed part on time and followed proper legal procedure, he wouldn't be wasting bandwidth.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<F28sc.37279$Wg6.21301@bignews5.bellsouth.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!controlnews3.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!cyclone.bc.net!newsfeed2.telusplanet.net!newsfeed.telus.net!bigfeed.bellsouth.net!bignumb.bellsouth.net!news.bellsouth.net!bignews5.bellsouth.net.POSTED!ae9a8d2e!not-for-mailReferences:
<nbidncVxmKAC3jPd4p2dnA@is.co.za> <2h90mfFabn1gU1@uni-berlin.de>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10cc56,57f97a0b68ce746c X-Google-Thread: 102066,57f97a0b68ce746c X-Google-Thread: fb1ea,57f97a0b68ce746c X-Google-Attributes: gid10cc56,gid102066,gidfb1ea,public Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!controlnews3.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!cyclone.bc.net!newsfeed2.telusplanet.net!newsfeed.telus.net!bigfeed.bellsouth.net!bignumb.bellsouth.net!news.bellsouth.net!bignews5.bellsouth.net.POSTED!ae9a8d2e!not-for-mail From: "Scott Hedrick" <dinehnm@KILLALLSPAMMERSyahoo.com> Newsgroups: sci.logic,us.legal.self-represent,can.legal References: <nbidncVxmKAC3jPd4p2dnA@is.co.za> <2h90mfFabn1gU1@uni-berlin.de> Subject: Re: Legal 'training' for negative-knowledge ? Lines: 21 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1409 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 Message-ID: <F28sc.37279$Wg6.21301@bignews5.bellsouth.net> X-Complaints-To: abuse@bellsouth.net X-Abuse-Info: Please forward a copy of all headers for proper handling X-Trace: ldjgbllpbapjglppdbdpiflmbcekedmfhojhikkbagflhcbohbgllmnjjfelfcgmamhmkgnjjcfdnhhejacaefmgcpkeggnpgmbjinolbjdpgiejhpaioafcakhcemfibdjjdjepffmbmikdaeemjjnagdfafjfd NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 23 May 2004 16:44:21 EDT Organization: BellSouth Internet Group Date: Sun, 23 May 2004 16:48:35 -0400