Article View: sci.materials
Article #4Re: fatigue of materials
From: Jeff Gates
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 1992 00:17
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 1992 00:17
42 lines
3024 bytes
3024 bytes
5916rahmank@vms.csd.mu.edu (K. M. A. Rahman) writes: > I like to add one more question. I have seen that, time-dependent > degradation in materials is termed as 'aging'. Since degradation > lead to failure, is there any substantial difference between > these two terms? Or just a matter of terminology? Aging (or ageing, depending on which sode of the Pacific you come from) does not generally refer to _degradation_ of materials, but rather a microstructural change occurring under the influence of thermal activation and time. A classic example is in precipitation hardening (age hardening) alloy systems -- second phase particles nucleate and grow over a period of time, and faster at elevated temperatures. Whether or not this is regarded as "degradation" depends on (a) what the final microstructure is, and (b) what properties you _want_. | Of course, there's no such thing as the "final" microstructure -- it | will continue to change -- but if the aging is carried out at elevated | temp, then cooling to room temp will typically slow the process down to | negligable levels. After quenching to retain a supersaturated solid solution, you deliberately age these alloys to form a fine distribution of second phase particles, in order to inhibit dislocation motion. This is what you want -- not degradation. But if, for example, the alloy ages at room temp (or in hot sunny conditions or whatever), then the alloy will _over-age_, the particles coarsen and the yield strngth will decrease. Assuming you want maximal yield strength, the material can be said to have been degraded. Note, however, that this does not lead _directly_ to failure; failure only occurs after a high stress, exceeding the (reduced) yield strength, is applied. There are many such failure modes associated with material change. But fatigue is not one of these -- fatigue is a failure mode in itself, and, as Philip Sargent (pms@eng.cam.ac.uk) pointed out a couple of weeks ago, does _not_ involve any change in the "molecular structure" of metals, as was thought in the '40s and perpetuated in novels like No Highway (Hammond Innes, I think). | jeff@minmet.uq.oz.au | Jeff Gates | | Dept Mining & Metallurgical _--_|\ | Ph. direct: +61 7 365 3726 | Engineering / B | Ph. Dept: +61 7 365 3738 | University of Queensland \_.--\_/ | Fax: +61 7 365 3888 | Brisbane Qld 4072 Australia v
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<jeff.720231458@mama>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!pacbell.com!sgiblab!munnari.oz.au!bunyip.cc.uq.oz.au!mama!jeffReferences:
<1992Oct21.203742.3567@utagraph.uta.edu>,<jeff.720087205@mama> <00962AAE.508D1DE0@vms.csd.mu.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: sci.materials Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!pacbell.com!sgiblab!munnari.oz.au!bunyip.cc.uq.oz.au!mama!jeff From: jeff@mama.minmet.uq.oz (Jeff Gates) Subject: Re: fatigue of materials Message-ID: <jeff.720231458@mama> Sender: news@bunyip.cc.uq.oz.au (USENET News System) Organization: Prentice Centre, University of Queensland References: <1992Oct21.203742.3567@utagraph.uta.edu>,<jeff.720087205@mama> <00962AAE.508D1DE0@vms.csd.mu.edu> Date: Wed, 28 Oct 1992 00:17:38 GMT Lines: 42