Article View: sci.materials
Article #74Re: Super Conducting Supercollider
From: Jon J Thaler
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 1992 15:52
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 1992 15:52
20 lines
1405 bytes
1405 bytes
rcj@lhdsy1.lahabra.chevron.com (R.C. Jones) says: > I know that the Macneil Leherer hour on PBS is > a political program, but I can't help asking if > my ears heard Rustum Roy say " Nobel Laureates in > physics! Who cares about them. " > What are the more scientific opinions about the value > of the Super Conducting SuperCollider program? Despite Rustum Roy's extremism (he said that the SSC is not science), the main issue is one of cost. Even Dale Bass would not object to the SSC if it only cost $10.95. The main scientific goal of the SSC is to discover the Higgs boson or its dynamical equivalent. One of these must exist if spontaneous symmetry breaking is responsible for low energy particle physics phenomenology. The energy of the SSC was chosen to ensure that theoretical predictions will be confronted by data. In the PBS program, I thought that Bumpers and Johnston, the politicians, did a much better job of presenting their cases than did Schwitters and Roy, the scientists.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<92213.075220DOCTORJ@SLACVM.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!ogicse!uwm.edu!linac!unixhub!slacvm!doctorjShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!ogicse!uwm.edu!linac!unixhub!slacvm!doctorj From: DOCTORJ@SLACVM.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU (Jon J Thaler) Newsgroups: sci.materials Subject: Re: Super Conducting Supercollider Message-ID: <92213.075220DOCTORJ@SLACVM.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU> Date: 31 Jul 92 15:52:19 GMT Article-I.D.: SLACVM.92213.075220DOCTORJ Organization: Stanford Linear Accelerator Center Lines: 20